Moa — Peer review for every prompt
Moa — Peer review for every prompt
Three models. One answer.<br>Peer reviewfor every prompt<br>Run Claude, GPT, and Gemini on every question in parallel —<br>cross-examine their reasoning, verify divergent claims,<br>and get one definitive response.<br>Try it for free<br>No credit card required
Claude Opus 4.8 GPT-5.6 Sol Gemini 3.1 Pro<br>Use cases<br>See the debate. Trust the decision.<br>Each color represents a different model. Where they overlap, they agree.<br>The final answer shows you exactly who contributed what.<br>Pick a question, then press send to run it<br>Career moveCross-border taxStartup strategy<br>I'm 34 with a stable corporate job and an offer from an early-stage startup: meaningful equity but 20% less salary. Should I take it?
Claude
Phase thinking
Searches
Influence ···
GPT
Phase thinking
Searches
Influence ···
Gemini
Phase thinking
Searches
Influence ···
The synthesized answer will appear here
Try it yourself
One model can sound right and still be wrong.<br>A single model can confidently hallucinate a citation, miss a critical angle, or lead you down<br>entirely the wrong path. Moa runs three frontier models independently, then an aggregator<br>cross-examines their answers and verifies the claims they make. Not three answers. One answer<br>that earned its confidence.
How it works<br>How three become one<br>Three models. Three independent answers. One synthesis.
01 · DISPATCH<br>Three models think independently<br>Your question goes to Claude, GPT, and Gemini simultaneously. Different training, different reasoning styles, different knowledge — three independent perspectives from a single prompt.
02 · ANALYSIS<br>Answers are cross-examined<br>A synthesis model evaluates all three responses on merit alone — identifying consensus, surfacing contradictions, and flagging claims that need verification.
03 · SYNTHESIS<br>One verified answer emerges<br>The strongest reasoning is combined into a single response. Divergent claims are verified. You see exactly which models contributed what — and where they disagreed.
Pricing<br>Built for questions you can't afford to get wrong.<br>5 free queries included, follow-ups count too. Paid plans unlock ongoing access.<br>Trial<br>5 free queries with lightweight models, follow-ups included, then upgrade for full access.
Free<br>Claude Haiku 4.5<br>GPT-5.6 Luna<br>Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite<br>Try it for free<br>Pro<br>Frontier multi-model analysis for serious research, strategy, and synthesis without compromise.
$29/month<br>Claude Sonnet 5<br>GPT-5.6 Terra<br>Gemini 3.5 Flash<br>Subscribe<br>Max<br>Maximum reasoning depth for complex, high-stakes problems that demand logic and precision.
$49/month<br>Claude Opus 4.8<br>GPT-5.6 Sol<br>Gemini 3.1 Pro<br>Subscribe
Queries never used for training<br>All three models run in parallel<br>Always the latest frontier models<br>Cancel anytime
Blog<br>Blog<br>July 1, 2026<br>AI hallucinations in consulting: what the Deloitte, EY, and KPMG failures teach about client deliverables<br>Within nine months, three of the Big Four shipped reports with AI-fabricated citations. Here is exactly how it happened, why internal review did not catch it, and the pre-delivery checklist that would have.<br>June 24, 2026<br>ChatGPT for due diligence: what it gets right, where it breaks, and how to verify it<br>Analysts already use ChatGPT in deal work. Here is what accuracy benchmarks actually show, the fabrication incidents on record, and a verification workflow for AI-assisted due diligence.<br>June 10, 2026<br>How to verify AI-generated legal citations (and what happens when lawyers don't)<br>Courts have sanctioned dozens of lawyers for citing cases that AI invented, with fines now past $100,000. Here is the full sanctions record and a verification workflow that catches fabricated citations before you file.
See all posts
FAQ<br>Common questions<br>Which model synthesizes the final answer? By default we pick the model best suited for synthesis, drawn from the same frontier models in your plan tier — Pro subscribers get a Pro-tier synthesizer, Max subscribers get a Max-tier one. If you'd rather decide for yourself, Settings lets you choose which model synthesizes the final answer (and moderates in Debate mode). Leave it on the default and you get our recommended pick without having to think about it.<br>Which plan is right for me? For most people, Pro is all you need — and may even be the better choice. The Pro models are fast, extremely capable, and well suited for research, fact-checking, and everyday analysis. Max is designed for tasks that genuinely require deep reasoning and extended thinking: complex logic problems, multi-step analysis, or high-stakes decisions where you want maximum depth. If you're unsure, start with Pro.<br>Why not just open Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini in three tabs? You could — but then you're the synthesizer. You'd need to read three full responses, mentally compare them, spot contradictions, and decide which reasoning to trust. Moa does this automatically with a dedicated aggregation step backed by peer-reviewed research on...