128Gb Eight Channel Workstation Madness Paired With ThreadRipper 3995WX & 24Gb GeForce 3090Ti In Windows 8.1 Operating System ► █▒░ Unlisted Retrograde Holdout

350W) of modern high-performance CPUs and my sheer lack of desire to mess around with water cooling solutions.">

Resolutions

¶ v4.8+

1988

Lo-Fi

Mute

Handmade retro vintage project

&nbsp 1 &nbsp ■ Hugo 0.121+

&nbsp 2 &nbsp ■ JavaScript ES6+

&nbsp 3 &nbsp ■ HTML 5

&nbsp 4 &nbsp ■ Markdown 1.0.1

&nbsp 5 &nbsp ■ CSS/SCSS 3

&nbsp 6 &nbsp ■ VS Codium 1.102

&nbsp 7 &nbsp ■ Far Manager 3.0.6

&nbsp 8 &nbsp ■ Notepad++ 8.9

&nbsp 9 &nbsp ■ OS Windows 7 x64 ESU+

Feel adventorous? Head to advanced settings!

Made by Trackerninja

[CONTACT ME] [SUPPORT ME]

&nbsp 2021 - 2026 © &nbsp

Gpu

Cpu

Intel

AMD

Nvidia

Windows8

ESU

Page content

← INDEX

You will see Windows 7 benchmarks in a while if i’ll be able to launch this beast under the Windows 7 wing

¶ PREFACE NOTE

Alright, this is the final multicore beast, operating on the mighty Windows 7.

While it is possible to run a Threadripper 7995WX or even a 9995WX, I am not going to do that.

This isn’t just because of the insane prices, but also due to the enormous TDP (>350W) of modern

high-performance CPUs and my sheer lack of desire to mess around with water cooling solutions.

Even though the 5995WX operates in the 280W range, I’ve decided to stick with the 3995WX because

I scored a pretty good deal on a brand-new Gigabyte GA-WRX80-SU8 mobo. Unfortunately, this mobotherboard

does not support the 5000 series, at least not officially. Support was present in the F5 version

of the BIOS, but it was rapidly removed due to compatibility and stability issues.

You can still acquire that older BIOS from Eastern servers or web archive backups,

but taking all of the above into account, common sense prevailed. I decided that saving money is a smart move,

especially when I’m not sponsored to do these kinds of builds.

A quick note on RAM: 2400MHz was chosen simply because I got a great deal on it.

AMD’s recommended speed is 3200MHz, which would theoretically provide 25% more memory bandwidth.

However, in practice, the performance increase would only be around 10–15% due to general system overhead.

Keep these figures in mind to get the complete picture.

As for cooling, a top-of-the-line Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3 will handle the 3995WX relatively easily.

Stock BIOS dated back 2021 had CSM issues, so it is recommended to update it to the latest F6 revision (2023).

█ COMPUTER CONFIGURATIONS

[1] ► ThreadRipper 3995WX / Gigabyte WRX80 SU8/ 128Gb DDR4 2400Mhz [8-channel] / GeForce 3090Ti 24Gb / Noctua NH-U14STR4-SP3

[2] ► Ryzen 9 7950X / MSI X670 / 64Gb DDR5 5600Mhz [2-channel] / GeForce 3090Ti 24Gb / Noctua NH-D15 SE AM5

PSU: Seasonic 1300Watt Gold [in both cases]

GFX SETTINGS:

2560x1600 32Bit color [where possible], ULTRA+ settings, Anti-aliasing is turned OFF

SOFTWARE:

Operating system: fully patched Windows 8.1 x64. All software were patched to the latest versions.

▒ FINAL REALITY [1996]

SYSTEM<br>[1]<br>[2]

ALL<br>109/13/21<br>198/16/38

3D<br>5000/348/254/429<br>5353/490/84/562

2D<br>815/200<br>962/546

BUS<br>122/691<br>598/899

AGP<br>536<br>972

Obviously due to it&rsquo;s age benchmark can&rsquo;t comprehend the real power of Threadripper

▒ 3DMARK 1999 MAX

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

3D<br>25<br>25

CPU<br>1024<br>632

Threadripper is valued a bit higher!

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK 2000

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

SCORE<br>2300<br>2303

Tie! Looks like the measuring limit for this benchmark.

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK 2001 SE

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

SCORE<br>128796

Testing application could not start, even patched version fixed to work with modern CPUs

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK 2003

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

SCORE<br>144599<br>7805

Surprise! 2003 benchmark has a capability to evaluate Ripper.

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK 2005

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

SCORE<br>46212<br>14998

ThreadRipper is a winner again.

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK 2006

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

3D<br>39815<br>18386

SM2<br>13670<br>7200

SM3<br>18522<br>5998

CPU<br>15027<br>20941

Threadripper here is substantially slower than consumer Ryzen, but GPU shines with 3995WX, quite weird results

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK VANTAGE [2007]

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

GPU<br>81479<br>20471

CPU<br>64365<br>100900

GPU showed a little better performance with Threadripper, CPU-wise Ripper performs very badly comparing to Ryzen.

Just for your information: Vantage is a DirectX 10.1 benchmark.

GPU performance on 7950x looks like a glitch of a hacked 3090Ti driver.

To observe Windows 7 results of 7950X machine click [here]

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK 2011

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

GS<br>17230<br>13607

PS<br>17217<br>18901

CS<br>15796<br>12900

GT1 [fps]<br>85<br>86

GT2 [fps]<br>82<br>81

GT3 [fps]<br>104<br>101

GT4 [fps]<br>52<br>50

PT [fps]<br>55<br>119

CT [fps]<br>74<br>100

DirectX 11 benchmark, handles Threadripper noticeably better than older ones

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ 3DMARK 2021

TEST<br>[1]<br>[2]

Fire Strike Ultra<br>24202/23314/14592<br>26800/48004/14820

We can clearly see that Threadripper is not a gaming platform at all

BACK TO TOP ▲

▒ UNIGINE SANCTUARY...