-->
The dangers of dimethylmercury | Opinion | Chemistry World
-->
-->
Your browser is not supported
Sorry but it looks as if your browser is out of date. To get the best experience using our site we recommend that you upgrade or switch browsers.
Find a solution
Skip to main content<br>Skip to navigation
Search our site
Search our site
Search
Menu
Close menu
Home
News
Research
Industry
Opinion
Features
Culture
Careers
Podcasts
Webinars
Collections
Back to parent navigation item
Collections
Energy storage and batteries
Framing the future: policies to catalyse India's innovation ecosystem
2025 in review
Women's health
Solutions for India's sustainability challenge
The future of analytical chemistry
Chemistry of the brain
Water and the environment
Chemical bonding
Antimicrobial resistance
AI and automation
Sustainability
Research culture
Nobel prize
Food science and cookery
Plastics and polymers
Periodic table
Coronavirus
Members
Home<br>News<br>Research<br>Industry<br>Opinion<br>Features<br>Culture<br>Careers<br>Podcasts<br>Webinars<br>CollectionsEnergy storage and batteries<br>Framing the future: policies to catalyse India's innovation ecosystem<br>2025 in review<br>Women's health<br>Solutions for India's sustainability challenge<br>The future of analytical chemistry<br>Chemistry of the brain<br>Water and the environment<br>Chemical bonding
Antimicrobial resistance<br>AI and automation<br>Sustainability<br>Research culture<br>Nobel prize<br>Food science and cookery<br>Plastics and polymers<br>Periodic table<br>Coronavirus
Members
More navigation items
Opinion
The dangers of dimethylmercury
By Ray Cavanaugh2019-02-19T09:30:00+00:00
Prefer Chemistry World<br>in Google search
No comments
Looking back at how the death of Karen Wetterhahn changed lab safety
When her pipette spilled one or two droplets onto her left-hand glove, chemistry professor Karen Wetterhahn was not especially concerned. After all, she had adhered to the safety regulations involving dimethylmercury. She was wearing a lab coat, along with goggles and disposable latex gloves. And, as the substance poses a risk through inhalation, she undertook the transfer beneath a fume hood.
The minuscule spill of this clear liquid had caused her no pain or any other sensation, and she had no reason to think the incident was serious. Besides, her work was too important to spend much time indulging any fears: Wetterhahn, the first female chemistry professor at Dartmouth College, US, had obtained the largest research grant in her school’s history to study and elucidate how heavy metals impact human health.1 Tragically, they would soon impact her own.
The accident
On 14 August 1996, Wetterhahn had been preparing mercury samples for NMR spectroscopy. ‘The dimethylmercury was the standard of choice for mercury NMR since it is a pure “neat” liquid, so you did not have to worry about concentration or pH effects that may give spurious chemical shifts,’ says Kent Sugden. Now a professor of chemistry and biochemistry at the University of Montana, US, in 1996 Sugden was a research associate at Dartmouth. He had made NMR standards of nontoxic mercury salts for Wetterhahn, but when she did not get the expected results she went back to using dimethylmercury to confirm her findings. He describes her as ‘a very thorough chemist’.
Source: Courtesy of Dartmouth College Library<br>Karen Wetterhahn’s death saw a massive reappraisal of dimethylmercury safety precautions
In January 1997, Wetterhahn began to notice tingling in her lower extremities. Even more alarming, she began to stumble while walking, her speech began to slur and her sight and hearing were impacted. After visiting hospital, she received a diagnosis of severe mercury toxicity. It was only then she remembered the spilled droplets; she had been unaware the substance had permeated her glove and seeped into her skin. The toxic threshold for human mercury content is 50µg/L. Wetterhahn’s exposure was around 80 times greater, at 4mg/L.
Few people in the world understood toxic metals as well as Wetterhahn did. She knew that, upon permeating the skin, dimethylmercury had a terminal destination: her brain. She commenced a treatment known as chelation therapy, which sought to convert the mercury within her body into a substance that she could excrete. However, it is easier for the body to expel mercury salts than dimethylmercury and, five months after exposure, the chance of any therapy working was slim. As her senses continued to diminish, she exhorted her department chairman to alarm persons in their line of work about the extreme hazards of dimethylmercury.
In early February 1997, just three weeks after the appearance of symptoms, Wetterhahn descended into a coma. She remained in a vegetative state until she died on 8 June 1997, aged 48, leaving behind a husband and two children.
Changing the rules
Even before Wetterhahn’s accident, some chemists had refused to work with dimethylmercury out of concerns for their safety. Yet while the...