Since the publication of the Jacobian Conjecture refutation, many people have asked for a Chain of Thought to be published so they can better understand the mathematical intuition that leads to the counterexample.Since none was published, I tried to clean room reverse engineer it: give one Claude Fable the result and ask it to generate a writeup of how to arrive at it without any spoilers, then ask a second Fable to follow the write up, if it s too easy remove details, if it s too hard add hints. I could have simplified further, I stopped because it s time to sleep, and I m sharing because it gave me some intuition for what s going on.This is what a successful run looks like (sadly Anthropic hide Chains of Thought):https://claude.ai/share/80526d56-1c23-407d-8f5c-59a704221454## IntuitionThis is my understanding of the interesting ideas (probably too summarized for Fable to consistently get it without a good harness; take with a grain of salt, I m not a mathematician; later there is a full prompt that was tested and contains everything needed):* No Bass–Connell–Wright or Drużkowski normal forms (those are reparametrizations that feel natural in this search but they turn low-complexity examples into high-complexity by trading off degree vs dimension, and the counterexample is low complexity) * Look in C^3, not C^2, C^2 is probably not interesting enough * Look for a 3:1 cover, not 2:1, there s some result due to Euler (as always) that shows 2:1 will not work * Look for a composition of two functions (a ratio of polynomials and a shear) that have Jacobian determinants `x` and `c/x` everywhere, except at `x=0` (do the standard trick for not defining at a hole and shoving all the problems into that one hole, that s where the `1 + xy` comes from)# Prompt for reproducing CoTHere: https://gist.github.com/SonOfLilit/8882a145048ba260b160568ba...