Reverse-engineering is cheap now
Simon Willison’s Weblog
Subscribe
Sponsored by: Atlassian — Give your agents a plan. Not a prompt. New Jira capabilities unlock full-context for AI-native software development. Assign tasks to Claude, Cursor, or GitHub Copilot, now directly from Jira. Learn more
20th July 2026
I keep hearing anecdotes from people who used coding agents to reverse-engineer and automate devices in their homes.
I think this is an interesting illustration of the impact of the reduced cost of writing code.
Prior to agents, it was entirely possible to reverse-engineer home devices. The problem was the ROI - was it really worth all of that effort? More importantly, any experienced programmer knows that undocumented, unstable APIs like that may well change or break in the future. Is that initial work worth the effort if you're committing yourself to a frustrating cycle of maintenance in the future?
Coding agents change that equation entirely. The effort to get a simple automation working has dropped, as has the cost of trying and failing to get it to work. Since the code is so cheap, the idea of having to maintain it in the future - or throw it away and start again - carries way less psychological baggage.
Posted 20th July 2026 at 7:24 pm
Recent articles
Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmark - 16th July 2026
The new GPT-5.6 family: Luna, Terra, Sol - 9th July 2026
sqlite-utils 4.0, now with database schema migrations - 7th July 2026
This is a note by Simon Willison, posted on 20th July 2026.
reverse-engineering<br>11
ai<br>2,134
generative-ai<br>1,886
llms<br>1,853
ai-assisted-programming<br>400
coding-agents<br>225
Monthly briefing
Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments.
Pay me to send you less!
Sponsor & subscribe
Disclosures
Colophon
©
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026