Open Meditron: An Auditable Pipeline for Clinical LLMs

instagraham1 pts0 comments

[2605.16215] Fully Open Meditron: An Auditable Pipeline for Clinical LLMs

Skip to main content

arXiv is now an independent nonprofit!<br>Learn more<br>&times;

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search &middot; Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2605.16215 (cs)

[Submitted on 15 May 2026 (v1), last revised 29 May 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Fully Open Meditron: An Auditable Pipeline for Clinical LLMs

Authors:Xavier Theimer-Lienhard, Mushtaha El-Amin, Fay Elhassan, Sahaj Vaidya, Victor Cartier-Negadi, David Sasu, Lars Klein, Mary-Anne Hartley<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Fully Open Meditron: An Auditable Pipeline for Clinical LLMs, by Xavier Theimer-Lienhard and 7 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) require scrutable, auditable pipelines that enable rigorous, reproducible validation. Yet current LLM-based CDSS remain largely opaque. Most "open" models are open-weight only, releasing parameters while withholding the data provenance, curation procedures, and generation pipelines that determine model behavior. Fully Open (FO) models, which expose the complete training stack end-to-end, do not currently exist in medicine. We introduce Fully Open Meditron, the first fully open pipeline for building LLM-CDSS, comprising a clinician-audited training corpus, a reproducible data construction and training framework, and a use-aligned evaluation protocol. The corpus unifies eight public medical QA datasets into a normalized conversational format and expands coverage with three clinician-vetted synthetic extensions: exam-style QA, guideline-grounded QA derived from 46,469 clinical practice guidelines, and clinical vignettes. The pipeline enforces system-wide decontamination, gold-label resampling of teacher generations, and end-to-end validation by a four-physician panel. We evaluate using an LLM-as-a-judge protocol over expert-written clinical vignettes, calibrated against 204 human raters. We apply the recipe to five FO base models (Apertus-70B/8B-Instruct, OLMo-2-32B-SFT, EuroLLM-22B/9B-Instruct). All MeditronFO variants are preferred over their bases. Apertus-70B-MeditronFO improves +6.6 points over its base (47.2% to 53.8%) on aggregate medical benchmarks, establishing a new FO SoTA. Gemma-3-27B-MeditronFO is preferred over MedGemma in 58.6% of LLM-as-a-judge comparisons and outperforms it on HealthBench (58% vs 55.9%). These results show that fully open pipelines can achieve state-of-the-art domain-specific performance without sacrificing auditability or reproducibility.

Comments:<br>Preprint. 31 pages, 10 figures. Code, models, and data: this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2605.16215 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2605.16215v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16215

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Xavier Theimer-Lienhard [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Fri, 15 May 2026 17:29:08 UTC (603 KB)

[v2]<br>Fri, 29 May 2026 15:56:10 UTC (603 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Fully Open Meditron: An Auditable Pipeline for Clinical LLMs, by Xavier Theimer-Lienhard and 7 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness,...

toggle open clinical fully arxiv pipeline

Related Articles