Carbon capture promises by politicians span almost 20 years | The Narwhal

Explore

News

In-Depth

Explainers

Investigations

On the ground

Photo Essays

Opinion

Analysis

Video

Newsletter

Inside The Narwhal

Member FAQs

Search

Become a Narwhal

Popular this week

What you need to know about wildfire smoke

‘Industrial sacrifice zone’: the plan to bring oil supertankers to the mouth of the Fraser River

What causes wildfires? Lightning, people, climate change … and obsessively putting them out

Meet Gary, an exotic cat that B.C. just outlawed as a pet

Don’t miss

Near Tofino, a push for gold is colliding with efforts to protect a rare coastal ecosystem

Guilbeault on Carney’s climate plan: ‘He thinks that the markets are going to do it’

In Nova Scotia, Mi’kmaq people mark 300 years of treaty — and broken promises

On the trail of this year’s epic Nunavut Quest dogsled race

Share

Summary

Two decades of records show Canadian politicians making big promises about carbon capture technology.

In 2008, one government report claimed Canada could capture as much as 600 million tonnes of carbon a year — and carbon capture technology could be “implemented quickly.”

From 2000 to 2024, a total of just 68.7 million tonnes of carbon dioxide was captured across Canada and experts say the technology has yet to be proven at scale.

It was March 2007. Apple had just debuted the iPhone. The Iraq War was raging. Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth had won two Oscars. And the prime minister of Canada was talking about “the exciting new technology called carbon capture and storage.”

“Instead of pumping tonnes of carbon dioxide into the Earth’s atmosphere, we may be able to collect it from our oilsands, our coal-fired electrical plants and other industrial emitters, and pump it deep underground where it will remain for eternity,” Stephen Harper told a crowd of journalists at an event in Edmonton that year.

“If we can perfect this technology, we can use it not only to curb Canada’s contribution to greenhouse gas production, but we could also export it around the world.”

Then-prime minister Stephen Harper speaking in 2007, alongside then-Alberta premier Ed Stelmach, about the use of carbon capture technology to reduce emissions. Photo: John Ulan / The Canadian Press

It was the beginning of a long line of claims from political leaders in Canada about how carbon capture could slash planet-warming industrial emissions, including in the oilsands, the world’s fourth-largest proven oil reserve, where 159 billion barrels lie buried under Albertan sand and clay.

For close to 20 years, both Liberal and Conservative governments have talked about using carbon capture and storage technology to filter out carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, from exhaust streams and store it so it doesn’t get released into the atmosphere, where it traps heat and causes climate change. Yet, while oilsands carbon pollution grew by three and a half times from 2007 to 2024 to 92 million tonnes, the ability of facilities in Canada to capture carbon from industrial sources hasn’t yet grown beyond a few million tonnes of emissions per year.

Meanwhile, the consequences of fossil fuels and climate change are being felt today. Life is more expensive, cities have dirtier air from wildfires, deadly heat waves and other extreme weather are more common, First Nations are disproportionately threatened with disasters and Canadians are more at risk of poverty, heart disease, cancer and premature death.

At the time Harper spoke in Edmonton, mining the oilsands was generating 26 million tonnes of emissions. The petroleum in the oilsands starts as a viscous goo called bitumen, and takes large amounts of electricity, steam, fuel and heavy machinery to mine and transform into usable products. This extra activity means oilsands production has been associated with more emissions than some other oil deposits, adding to its climate impact when its end products like gasoline are eventually burned for energy.

For almost two decades both Liberal and Conservative governments have talked about using carbon capture technology to lower industrial emissions, while oilsands carbon pollution grew by three and a half times. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

There was also a boom happening when Harper made his remarks. Investment in the oilsands had tripled from 2003 to 2007, leap-frogging manufacturing, while oil and gas operating profits had doubled. Office space in Calgary, where many oil companies are headquartered, had dried up as the province rode a wave of record-low unemployment. By 2009, production levels from the oilsands would muscle out other forms of oil production in Canada.

Scientists agree the way to slow the chaos unleashed by climate change is to stop using so much oil, gas and coal. But Harper wasn’t about to impose strict government limits on oilsands emissions that day in 2007. Instead, he would talk about using carbon capture as a possible environmental and...