The Great Barrier Reef is changing. Why isn’t it on UNESCO’s ‘in danger’ list?
Type in a search term
Search
Advanced search
Follow
Follow
Follow UNSW on LinkedIn
Follow UNSW on Instagram
Follow UNSW on Facebook
Follow UNSW on WeChat
Follow UNSW on TikTok
The Great Barrier Reef is changing. Why isn’t it on UNESCO’s ‘in danger’ list?
Photo: Richard Freeman, UNSW Sydney
Melissa Lyne,
A UNESCO draft decision will keep the Great Barrier Reef off its ‘in danger’ list. Meanwhile the Reef keeps changing as ocean temperatures continue to rise.
The Great Barrier Reef has again avoided being placed on UNESCO's list of World Heritage in Danger, five years after Australia successfully opposed an earlier recommendation it be placed on the list.
The draft decision, now before this week's World Heritage Committee meeting in Busan, South Korea, recognises Australia's investment in reef management while also expressing grave concern over repeated mass bleaching, deteriorating ecological conditions and the continuing impacts of climate change.
The world's oceans have just experienced their hottest June on record. Marine heatwaves are also becoming more frequent, and the Great Barrier Reef has suffered through six mass bleaching events in less than a decade.
The draft also calls for further reporting on the Reef's most recent bleaching event in 2025 and Australia's progress on improving water quality.
While the Committee can still amend the recommendation in the next few days, UNSW Professor Lucas Lixinski, an expert in international law and World Heritage, says whatever the final wording, the underlying questions about the Reef's future remain.
“It's not that it resolves the issue,” Prof. Lixinski says.
“It just says, ‘In a few years, we're going to revisit this.’”
Media enquiries
For media enquiries and to arrange interviews, please contact Melissa Lyne :
Tel: 0415 514 328
Email: m.lyne@unsw.edu.au
Featured experts
Alex Sen Gupta,
Lucas Lixinski,
Bleached Acropora corals on the northern Great Barrier Reef.
Photo: Getty Images
Corals experience extremes, not averages
“While the high global average gives us a very broad picture, a coral really only cares about the temperature at its own reef,” says UNSW Professor Alex Sen Gupta, an expert in marine heatwaves.
Corals bleach when water temperatures stay above their local tolerance. If heat stress is intense or prolonged, bleaching can lead to coral mortality.
“The coral doesn’t experience the average,” Prof. Sen Gupta says.
As the climate warms, those damaging temperatures become more likely.
Prof. Sen Gupta describes this as “loading the dice”, where each increment of warming increases the likelihood of the prolonged heat that can trigger coral bleaching.
“The whole temperature distribution is shifting upwards, so we are seeing extreme heat more often,” he says.
We are seeing extreme heat more often.
Professor Alex Sen Gupta
A changing Reef
Before a mass bleaching event in 2024, coral cover had risen to high levels across many parts of the Great Barrier Reef, driven mostly by fast-growing Acropora corals.
But coral cover is only one measure of reef condition. It doesn’t show the diversity or composition of the coral community, or how vulnerable that community may be to the next disturbance.
“The headline figure can be high coral cover, while the underlying coral community itself has degraded substantially,” Prof. Sen Gupta says.
Those fast-growing corals can recolonise quickly after a disturbance, but many are also highly susceptible to marine heatwaves, cyclones and crown-of-thorns starfish.
“High coral cover does not mean the Reef has returned to the same ecological state,” Prof. Sen Gupta says.
“Fast-growing corals can rebuild more quickly, but they are also among the first lost when heat stress returns.
“Eventually temperatures could get too high for these species to recover.”
We're trying to protect those sites from ourselves.
Professor Lucas Lixinski
UNESCO measures stewardship
“When a country nominates a site for World Heritage listing, it's effectively saying ‘this place has outstanding universal value’,” Prof. Lixinski says.
“It's recognising that this place matters not just to one country, but to humanity.”
UNESCO adopted the World Heritage Convention in 1972, with the international treaty founded on the idea that some places are too important to belong to one nation alone.
The Convention provides the framework for protecting sites of outstanding universal value – it is not a direct scientific index of ecosystem health. The Committee considers scientific advice alongside whether governments are acting as appropriate stewards.
“We're trying to protect those sites from ourselves,” Prof. Lixinski says.
Human-caused climate change is now testing whether the Convention that was built to protect exceptional places can respond to a planetary-scale threat.
Why the list matters
The World Heritage system has...