The Conspiracy Against High Temperature LLM Sampling · GitHub
/" data-turbo-transient="true" />
Skip to content
-->
Search Gists
Search Gists
Sign in
Sign up
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
Hellisotherpeople/fk_top_p_and_top_k.md
Last active<br>July 22, 2026 05:35
Show Gist options
Download ZIP
Star
11<br>(11)
You must be signed in to star a gist
Fork
(2)
You must be signed in to fork a gist
Embed
Select an option
Embed<br>Embed this gist in your website.
Share<br>Copy sharable link for this gist.
Clone via HTTPS<br>Clone using the web URL.
No results found
Learn more about clone URLs
Clone this repository at <script src="https://gist.github.com/Hellisotherpeople/71ba712f9f899adcb08b94bce20d5397.js"></script>
" readonly="readonly" data-autoselect="true" data-target="primer-text-field.inputElement " aria-describedby="validation-f1e3251b-7ecb-49cd-9bff-68f6d216cb7e" class="form-control FormControl-monospace FormControl-input FormControl-small rounded-left-0 rounded-right-0 border-right-0" type="text" name="gist-share-url-sized-down" />
Save Hellisotherpeople/71ba712f9f899adcb08b94bce20d5397 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Embed
Select an option
Embed<br>Embed this gist in your website.
Share<br>Copy sharable link for this gist.
Clone via HTTPS<br>Clone using the web URL.
No results found
Learn more about clone URLs
Clone this repository at <script src="https://gist.github.com/Hellisotherpeople/71ba712f9f899adcb08b94bce20d5397.js"></script>
" readonly="readonly" data-autoselect="true" data-target="primer-text-field.inputElement " aria-describedby="validation-ee43ef1a-e690-4dca-ab54-cf57f65ad180" class="form-control FormControl-monospace FormControl-input FormControl-small rounded-left-0 rounded-right-0 border-right-0" type="text" name="gist-share-url-original" />
Save Hellisotherpeople/71ba712f9f899adcb08b94bce20d5397 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
The Conspiracy Against High Temperature LLM Sampling
Raw
fk_top_p_and_top_k.md
The Conspiracy Against High Temperature Sampling
Or: Why Your LLM Outputs Are Boring and Whose Fault It Really Is
There's a quiet war being waged in the machine learning inference space, and most of you don't even know you're losing it. Every day, millions of people interact with large language models through sanitized, corporatized interfaces that offer them a single "creativity" slider at best. Often they get nothing at all. Meanwhile, a small cabal of researchers and hobbyists has been pushing the boundaries of what's actually possible with modern sampling techniques. Yes, this includes the much maligned "coomer" community.
We live in a time of revealed conspiracies. The Epstein files have shown us what happens when powerful institutions coordinate to suppress information and protect their interests. Flight logs that sat in plain sight for years. Connections that "serious people" dismissed as paranoid speculation until the documents dropped. The pattern is always the same! Information asymmetry wielded as a tool of control, with the insiders knowing what the public isn't allowed to see.
I'm not saying the sampling parameter situation is morally equivalent to... that. Obviously not. But the structure is the same. There's information and capability that exists, that's been published, validated, proven to work, and there's a coordinated (if perhaps explicitly conspired) effort to keep it out of mainstream hands. The people who run inference infrastructure know about these techniques. They employ the people who invented them. They choose not to expose them. And when you ask why, you get the same dismissive non answers that precede every eventually revealed cover up: "users don't need this," "it's too complicated," "trust us, we know best."
I want to walk you through how we got here. I want to show you what we're missing. Most importantly, I want to explain why the companies that build the most powerful AI systems in history have collectively decided that you, the user, cannot be trusted with a few extra parameters.
The State of Affairs: 2019 Called, They Want Their Samplers Back!
This is the sad state of the current landscape for LLM sampling in 2025.
OpenAI's API gives you temperature, top_p, and more recently top_k. Their playground offers only a temperature slider. You can adjust how "creative" the model is on a scale that might as well be labeled "boring" to "slightly less boring." Anthropic's API offers temperature, top_p, and top_k, but Claude.ai's consumer interface gives you nothing. Zero sampling control. You take what you're given. Google's Gemini follows the same pattern with temperature and top_p....