#1253 - Proposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions - Codeberg/org - Codeberg.org
This website requires JavaScript.
Codeberg/org
Watch
49
Star
121
Fork
44
Code
Issues
15
Pull requests
17
Activity
Proposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions #1253
Merged
Gusted<br>merged 2 commits from gedankenstuecke/org:20260629-llm-proposal into main 2026-07-22 02:27:01 +02:00
Conversation<br>13
Commits
Files changed
+1
gedankenstuecke
commented 2026-06-29 22:34:33 +02:00
Member
Copy link
Here is the proposed addition for the ToU that @Gusted and I agreed on post-assembly for the upcoming membership vote. 🙏
The discussion for this proposal is available for Codeberg e. V. members in the forum: https://forum.codeberg.org/d/139-resolutions-for-assembly-on-codeberg-taking-a-stand-against-ai
Signed-off-by: gedankenstuecke gedankenstuecke@noreply.codeberg.org
Here is the proposed addition for the ToU that @Gusted and I agreed on post-assembly for the upcoming membership vote. 🙏
The discussion for this proposal is available for Codeberg e. V. members in the forum: https://forum.codeberg.org/d/139-resolutions-for-assembly-on-codeberg-taking-a-stand-against-ai
Signed-off-by: gedankenstuecke
👍
gedankenstuecke
added 1 commit 2026-06-29 22:34:33 +02:00
Proposal Assembly 2026: prohibit LLM-extrusions
...
96fac426a3
Signed-off-by: gedankenstuecke
camopants
requested changes 2026-07-07 20:20:01 +02:00
camopants
left a comment
Copy link
Agree with the suggestion in spirit, but correct English would be:
"Such projects have an unclear copyright status..."
and either
"...furthermore have little safeguard..."
or
"...furthermore have few safeguards..."
Agree with the suggestion in spirit, but correct English would be:
"Such projects have an unclear copyright status..."
and either
"...furthermore have little safeguard..."
or
"...furthermore have few safeguards..."
👍
gedankenstuecke
commented 2026-07-07 21:21:02 +02:00
Author
Member
Copy link
As highlighted by @Gusted for #1254, status quo for now due to being sent for voting, minor edits can be made by the board/presidium if the text generally passes.
As highlighted by @Gusted for #1254, status quo for now due to being sent for voting, minor edits can be made by the board/presidium if the text generally passes.
nieldk
commented 2026-07-08 13:12:08 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy link
"You must not share projects"
Is this reffering to PR's cpmmitted to (other) Codeberg repositories
Is 'sharing' including sharing code, outside Codeberg, from a Codeberg repository
Is it accepted that such repository is kept 'private' (note, here sharing could also include allowing individuals access to said provate repository)
"that mostly consist of code "
What is 'mostly' ?
"You must not share projects"<br>- Is this reffering to PR's cpmmitted to (other) Codeberg repositories<br>- Is 'sharing' including sharing code, outside Codeberg, from a Codeberg repository<br>- Is it accepted that such repository is kept 'private' (note, here sharing could also include allowing individuals access to said provate repository)<br>"that mostly consist of code "<br>- What is 'mostly' ?
gedankenstuecke
commented 2026-07-08 13:52:13 +02:00
Author
Member
Copy link
Beyond it being too late for substantial changes, it's out of scope for this change. It uses the identical language around sharing as used for the other points on acceptable/unacceptable content.
If you understand what sharing means in the context of "You must not share any content that's expressing hate or encouraging violence", the same applies here.
Beyond it being too late for substantial changes, it's out of scope for this change. It uses the identical language around sharing as used for the other points on acceptable/unacceptable content.
If you understand what sharing means in the context of "You must not share any content that's expressing hate or encouraging violence", the same applies here.
infosec812
commented 2026-07-08 14:42:14 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy link
I am in favor of this proposal. The copyright issues alone are sufficient to be problematic for a non-profit.
I am in favor of this proposal. The copyright issues alone are sufficient to be problematic for a non-profit.
nieldk
commented 2026-07-08 15:55:26 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy link
@infosec812 wrote in #1253 (comment):
I am in favor of this proposal. The copyright issues alone are sufficient to be problematic for a non-profit.
The copyright issue is always relevant, not directly related to this proposal alone.
It’s also quite often broken, as is LICENSE
@infosec812 wrote in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253#issuecomment-18801527:
> I am in favor of this proposal. The copyright issues alone are sufficient to be problematic for a non-profit.
The copyright issue is always relevant, not directly related to this proposal alone.<br>It’s also quite often...