How does Make America Healthy Again hold up against scientific scrutiny?
Skip to main content
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain<br>the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in<br>Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles<br>and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Bluesky
US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr announced the country’s latest set of dietary guidelines in January. Anna Moneymaker/Getty
The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, spearheaded by US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, aims to “confront chronic disease, improve nutrition, and lower healthcare costs”. To achieve these laudable aims, those in the MAHA movement have set out to overhaul US health policies on aspects such as nutrition and vaccines and what they see as an over-reliance on medication. Such huge shifts in the United States are likely to have ripple effects around the world.<br>Kennedy says the MAHA policies are based on “gold standard” science. Some aspects have garnered support from the research community. But in other areas, critics say, the MAHA platform includes claims that are misleading or hyperbolic — for example, those around the efficacy of vaccines and the risk factors for autism spectrum disorder.<br>What does the science say? Nature spoke to researchers about some of the MAHA initiative’s prominent talking points.<br>‘Eat more meat and dairy to stay healthy’<br>On 7 January, the US health and agriculture departments launched their Dietary Guidelines for Americans for 2025 to 2030, a set of recommendations that shape the country’s nutrition and health policies, such as establishing food choices in schools. The guidelines call for US citizens to “eat more real food”, notably diets rich in red meat, full-fat dairy products, fresh fruits and vegetables, with strict limits on added sugars and ultra-processed foods. “Most of their statements are consistent with old statements to focus on real foods,” says Christopher Gardner, director of nutrition studies at the Stanford Prevention Research Center in Palo Alto, California.<br>But, Gardner says, the guidelines’ emphasis on red meat and dairy results in an increase in the recommended protein intake — from 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day to between 1.2 and 1.6 grams. The recommendation thus sidesteps a 2025 systematic review of protein requirements, which concluded that there wasn’t enough evidence to change the 0.8-gram suggestion1. The dietary guidelines have previously set recommendations in terms of servings of food rather than grams of nutrients. As a result, Gardner says, “the new number was out of left field”.<br>Gardner was one of 20 people appointed to the 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC), an independent group that advises the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Agriculture on the development of dietary guidelines. In December 2024, the committee prepared a 421-page report collating the latest science underlying the guidance.<br>The MAHA initiative’s slogan adorns the headquarters of the US Department of Health and Human Services, which is spearheading the campaign.Credit: Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images/ALAMY<br>A separate, supplemental review was subsequently produced by a nine-person committee appointed by the administration of US President Donald Trump. This was used in the creation of the 2025–30 guidelines, alongside some recommendations from the DGAC.<br>Walter Willett, a physician and nutrition researcher at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, says that some of the research underpinning the latest guidelines did not undergo a substantive review process that was open to public comment. “The documents attached to the guidelines have nowhere near the rigour of the published report conducted by the original expert committee,” he says.<br>Despite those concerns, some groups of individuals could benefit from a higher protein intake, notably older adults and athletes who want to put on muscle. Stuart Phillips, a health researcher at McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, and his colleagues advocated in a 2018 study that older adults should eat at least 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight to combat muscle loss2. Too much animal protein, however, can lead to a higher risk of developing kidney stones, according to a 2023 study3. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence in 2010 found that diets packed with processed meats are associated with increased risks of coronary heart disease and diabetes4.<br>‘Ultra-processed foods cause chronic disease’<br>The 2025–30 guidelines recommend avoiding highly processed, prepared and ready-to-eat foods as well as sugar-sweetened beverages and products containing added sugar or non-nutritive...