Treating Agent Memory and Costs as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems

gdad1 pts0 comments

[2607.21503] Agentic Context Management: Solving Agent Memory and Cost by Treating Them as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2607.21503 (cs)

[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026]

Title:Agentic Context Management: Solving Agent Memory and Cost by Treating Them as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems

Authors:Gaurav Dadhich<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Agentic Context Management: Solving Agent Memory and Cost by Treating Them as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems, by Gaurav Dadhich

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Production AI agents' failures are less often due to an inability to reason well and more often because they cannot manage what is in their reasoning context: conversation histories, large prompts, large tool definitions, and ballooning tool outputs. Agents drown in their own accumulating history while paying a token cost that grows every turn, producing missing recalls within and across conversations. The incumbent response treats this as a storage-and-retrieval problem. We argue that framing is too narrow. Actively managing what an agent holds in mind is a lifecycle, not merely a store: it spans deciding what to remember, extracting and structuring it, choosing the right store per data type, consolidating and forgetting while preserving provenance, deciding what is relevant now, anticipating what is needed next, and compacting context to a budget without losing what matters. In serious production this operates not over a single user but across an organizational scope hierarchy. We name this discipline Agentic Context Management (ACM) and decompose it into five primitives: architecting, ingesting, scoping, anticipating, and compacting & consolidation. We then make the economic case: naive context accumulation grows token cost quadratically in conversation length, crude summarization buys linear cost at the price of an accuracy cliff, and only validated compaction achieves linear cost with preserved fidelity. We describe a reference implementation, Maximem Synap, that realizes the five primitives as a multi-tenant service and reports 92% on LongMemEval and 93.2% on LoCoMo under the configuration detailed in Section 6. We close with dimensions existing benchmarks do not yet capture, latency, token efficiency, and context-rot resistance, and the frontier of decision-level and organization-level context the category points toward.

Comments:<br>23 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables. Evaluation harness and study data: this http URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

ACM classes:<br>I.2.7; I.2.11; H.3.3

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2607.21503 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2607.21503v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21503

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Gaurav Dadhich [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:51:31 UTC (123 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Agentic Context Management: Solving Agent Memory and Cost by Treating Them as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems, by Gaurav Dadhich<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.IR

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv...

toggle context cost arxiv agent lifecycle

Related Articles