The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation

NickDouglas2 pts1 comments

[2607.21547] The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2607.21547 (cs)

[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026]

Title:The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation

Authors:Fares Fourati, Hinrich Schütze, Eyke Hüllermeier, Iryna Gurevych<br>View a PDF of the paper titled The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation, by Fares Fourati and 3 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The rapid progress of AI has intensified the long-standing pursuit of automation: replacing human participation with algorithms wherever possible. Implicit in this pursuit is the assumption that humans remain in the loop only because current AI systems are not yet sufficiently capable. This paper challenges that assumption. Rather than asking how far automation can extend, we ask where its conceptual limits lie and argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems for three distinct reasons. Technical or complementarity grounds arise when humans contribute capabilities or perspectives unavailable to AI. Normative or developmental grounds arise when participation itself is valuable for human agency or learning. Most importantly, emergence grounds arise from target emergence: in some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself. In these cases, human participation is not merely a means of improving execution but is constitutive of the target being produced. Human--AI co-construction, understood as the joint production of outcomes by humans and AI systems, is therefore not simply a temporary response to imperfect AI, but a persistent feature of activities whose objectives emerge through participation. This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation and for the design, evaluation, and ethics of future AI systems.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2607.21547 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2607.21547v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21547

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Fares Fourati [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:33:43 UTC (1,877 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation, by Fares Fourati and 3 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.CL<br>cs.ET<br>cs.LG<br>cs.MA

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Major funding support from

toggle human participation arxiv automation persistent

Related Articles