Al-Qaida and the Islamic State are both adopting AI – but differ in how they think about the technology
Skip to content
Extremist groups and their networks use AI but think about it differently.<br>Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images
https://theconversation.com/al-qaida-and-the-islamic-state-are-both-adopting-ai-but-differ-in-how-they-think-about-the-technology-287663
https://theconversation.com/al-qaida-and-the-islamic-state-are-both-adopting-ai-but-differ-in-how-they-think-about-the-technology-287663
Link copied
Share article
Share article
Kopier Link
Blauer Himmel
Messenger
X (Twitter)
Print article
Artificial intelligence may not create a new kind of terrorism, but it makes existing tactics cheaper, faster and easier. That is the central argument of a July 2026 report from the U.S.-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies.
It is a convincing argument, but it leaves one question unanswered: Are different terrorist groups thinking about the technology in the same way?
As a terrorism expert who studies how militant groups think and adapt, I have analyzed propaganda, guides and strategic writings from the two most influential jihadi movements of the 21st century – al-Qaida and the Islamic State group – to observe how they interpret and adopt new technologies, such as AI. I also examined documented uses of AI by their affiliates, media outlets and supporters.
I found that affiliates, media outlets and supporters across both movements use AI for propaganda, recruitment, security and planning. But al-Qaida and Islamic State-linked networks approach AI in ways that reflect how each movement fights. Al-Qaida is more deliberate and thinks in decades. The Islamic State moves quickly and seeks immediate effect.
In short, each group’s approach reflects its organizational culture and reveals a different view of time and war. The Islamic State built its project around a caliphate to hold and display now – and that urgency rewards whoever produces a visible effect today. Al-Qaida built its project around a generational war of attrition, betting that will and endurance could outlast a technologically superior enemy.
The Islamic State AI approach
The Islamic State has long been the more aggressive media innovator of the two movements. At the height of its self-declared caliphate in Syria and Iraq, it built a sophisticated media apparatus prioritizing speed, spectacle and professional production. That instinct has carried into the AI era, aided by younger, digitally immersed supporters and recruits who readily experiment with new tools.
Since 2023, Islamic State supporters and affiliates have produced a growing stream of AI-generated content. After the March 2024 Moscow concert hall attack that killed more than 130 people, supporters circulated a bulletin celebrating the killings. It featured a fake, AI-generated Arabic-speaking anchor who framed the attack as part of the group’s wider war against its enemies.
People bring flowers to a makeshift memorial following a terrorist attack at the Crocus City Hall outside Moscow on March 25, 2024.<br>Olga Maltseva/AFP via Getty Images
Islamic State-linked networks have also used AI to generate images, speed up translation and produce multilingual propaganda.
In June 2025, the Islamic State group’s Afghanistan affiliate, Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K), published an issue of its English-language magazine, Voice of Khorasan. Released by al-Azaim Foundation, it framed AI literacy as an individual religious duty for every Muslim. This placed AI literacy in the same legal category that jihadi ideologues often apply to defensive jihad – a duty to fight when Muslims, their faith or their territory come under attack.
The article casts AI as a force already shaping war, business and identity. It also warns about deepfakes, surveillance and data collection, offering practical guidance on protecting oneself.
The foundation later withdrew the religious label, reportedly after ridicule from other jihadi groups, but left the guidance in place. This suggests a pattern of rapid adoption followed by doctrinal correction.
Taken with wider Islamic State-linked experimentation, the episode points to a logic of mobilization, whereby followers are taught that ignorance leaves them vulnerable to adversaries already using the technology.
In the material I reviewed, the central question is not whether AI changes the nature of war, but how to use it, guard against it and avoid being left behind.
Al-Qaida is experimenting, too
Al-Qaida’s affiliates and supporters are also experimenting with the emerging technology.
Pro-al-Qaida outlets were circulating likely AI-generated imagery as early as 2023, and its networks have promoted chatbot workshops and guides. In 2024, the al-Qaida-linked Al-Malahem Electronic Army released a guide titled “Amazing Ways to Use AI-Powered Chatbots,” offering supporters advice on using the...