[2607.20318] The Polynomial-Time Low-Degree Conjecture is False
Skip to main content
Search arXiv
Press Enter to search · Advanced search
-->
Computer Science > Computational Complexity
arXiv:2607.20318 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Jul 2026]
Title:The Polynomial-Time Low-Degree Conjecture is False
Authors:Songtao Mao<br>View a PDF of the paper titled The Polynomial-Time Low-Degree Conjecture is False, by Songtao Mao
View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The low-degree method and its associated lower bounds are widely used to guide algorithm design and to provide evidence of computational hardness in average-case inference, high-dimensional statistics, random optimization, and related problems. This led to the low-degree conjecture, which predicts that when the low-degree advantage between a planted distribution and a uniform null distribution remains bounded, no efficient distinguisher can succeed after independent noise, provided that the planted distribution has permutation symmetry. Several works have produced counterexamples to variants of this conjecture or to versions for algorithms with higher time complexity, but the conjecture remained open in its standard binary, polynomial-time formulation.
We disprove the polynomial-time low-degree conjecture by giving a family of examples in this setting. For every fixed integer $r\geq3$, we construct a permutation-invariant distribution $\mathbb{P}_n$ on simple graphs, with $\mathbb{Q}_n=G(n,1/2)$, such that every marginal of $\mathbb{P}_n$ on at most $D_n=\Theta((\log n)^{r-1})$ edges is uniform. Therefore, the low-degree advantage is zero through degree $D_n$. Nevertheless, after every edge is independently resampled at a fixed positive rate, a deterministic rank test strongly distinguishes the resulting distribution from $\mathbb{Q}_n$ in polynomial time.
The construction chooses a subspace of a Reed--Muller code whose nonzero polynomials have small absolute bias, selects points whose evaluation vectors have no short linear dependencies, and evaluates a random alternating bilinear form on pairs of these vectors. Our result shows that low-degree indistinguishability, a uniform null distribution, permutation invariance, and independent resampling do not by themselves imply polynomial-time hardness, and suggests that a valid general conjecture must impose an additional condition.
Comments:<br>17 pages
Subjects:
Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as:<br>arXiv:2607.20318 [cs.CC]
(or<br>arXiv:2607.20318v1 [cs.CC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20318
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history<br>From: Songtao Mao [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:04:22 UTC (19 KB)
Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled The Polynomial-Time Low-Degree Conjecture is False, by Songtao Mao<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CC
next >
new<br>recent<br>| 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs<br>cs.DS
References & Citations
NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Major funding support from