AI labs don't know how to make you trust them
SubscribeSign in
AI labs don't know how to make you trust them<br>The semiotics of trust
SEMIO DEPT.<br>Jul 27, 2026<br>∙ Paid
Share
Background - What this is for
Whether people trust your company has little correlation with how trustworthy you claim to be. Or how many times you mention that you care about client trust. If you’re in your infancy, they they have no public record to keep track of either.<br>Ask users why certain businesses feel more trustworthy than others and they’ll struggle to answer with any level of detail, even if they are all answering with the same options.<br>This is because most transmissions of trustworthiness are happening at the unconscious level, and your unconscious mind doesn’t use language in the same way your conscious mind does. The unconscious speaks the language of symbols, imagery, and associations.<br>Your message is still important, but rather than the exact wording, the following are getting processed by the reader without them even realising: the tone its taking, whether its showing its sources, whether it owns up to what it can’t do, whether it feels like a person or a machine. These are all signals of trustworthiness, and your users read those signals against every brand that already asks them to believe something.<br>That doesn’t mean there’s a right way to do any of those. As depending on what you’re trying to do for the customer, and what vibe you are trying to get across, the trust function will actually look quite different.<br>So to show you the different avenues currently being used to make customers feel assured, we’ve conducted a semiotic analysis across the worlds of 27 brands whose entire job is to be believed, from Rolex to Reuters to the frontier AI labs. We’ve decoded their output for the aesthetics, symbols, images, and a few more tricks each one uses to manufacture belief.<br>To make it easier to consume, we’ve highlighted the two biggest dimensions that organise the group, the quartiles of which produce our four territories, each with its own codes.<br>Codes are also useful because they tell what other things and brands you will be associated with if you choose to use them.<br>Mapping the territories also shows a (limited) view of which strategies get used most often, and which are less crowded. As a word of caution, crowded doesn’t mean best, but it also doesn’t mean over-crowded. You will still need to know what works best for you.
We will be posting semiotic analyses every single day, first thing in the morning. The easiest thing to do is to subscribe so they land in your inbox, and you don’t miss any.
Subscribe
Dimension 1: Authority vs. Evidence
Do you give want to give the impression that trust should be assumed, or are you making an effort to prove yourself?<br>Heritage tends to be important here. On the Authority side, brands speak for themselves. Rolex’s crown carries obvious implications, for example.<br>Heritage isn’t really an option for newer AI companies though, but a few still try to spell out authority in other ways. Anthropic has a published constitution. Harvey has a client list of law firms you’ve heard of. None of them show you much. They tell you who they are and expect that to be enough.<br>On the Evidence side, you check for yourself, enabled by the business. Open source, citations, live numbers, reviews. Signal shows you the ciphertext. Perplexity shows you the sources. Stripe shows you the uptime. Trustpilot, and I quite like this one, shows you the one-star reviews on its own homepage.<br>“Don’t take our word for it”, while still of course subtly hoping you do indeed take their word for it.<br>Here’s how they line-up on that first dimension:
Dimension 2: Human vs. System
Ok, so you’ve decided whether you’re going to try to prove how trustworthy you are.<br>Next is the medium of that interaction. Or to be more specific, who it is that is giving that message.<br>The first option is to humanise. Make the customer feel like they are talking to a person. So you get a lot of: Faces, care, ‘membership’, reassurance, the sense of being looked after.<br>Light version would be how Amex shows members on beaches. Whereas Sierra spends its whole homepage on one warm portrait and barely mentions the product.<br>The other option is to make the customer feel like they are interacting with a system. That may sound cold, but sometimes that is what you want. You just want to be sure the thing works, and well-oiled machines do.<br>At this end of the spectrum you get a lot of: infrastructure, statistics, austerity, often not a single person on the page. Stripe gives you a GDP counter ticking in the corner. Anthropic gives you documents.<br>So this axis is basically warmth versus machinery, here’s how they line-up:
The Territory Map
Taking our brands and placing them on both axes gives us this plain. The quadrants show which trust game each brand is trying to play, which is also the game your users will assume you’re playing the second they land on...