An Uncomplicated Man

andsoitis1 pts0 comments

Emily Wilson · An Uncomplicated Man

An Uncomplicated ManEmily Wilson

Share on BlueskyShare on FacebookEmailPrintSearch

Close

Close<br>AcceptClose

Close

CloseMy Account<br>·Sign out<br>Sign in

Newsletters<br>Home<br>The PaperLatest Issue<br>Letters<br>-->Archive<br>Contributors<br>About the LRB

SubjectsArts & Culture<br>Biography & Memoir<br>History & Classics<br>Literature & Criticism<br>Philosophy & Law<br>Politics & Economics<br>Psychology & Anthropology<br>Science & Technology

Blog<br>Podcasts & Videos<br>Events<br>ShopBookshop<br>LRB Store

Subscribe

CloseSearch<br>More search Options<br>Search by contributor<br>Browse our cover archive

Browse by Subject<br>Arts & Culture<br>Biography & Memoir<br>History & Classics<br>Literature & Criticism<br>Philosophy & Law<br>Politics & Economics<br>Psychology & Anthropology<br>Science & Technology

Vol. 48 No. 14 · 13 August 2026

An Uncomplicated Man<br>Emily Wilson

Share on BlueskyShare on FacebookShareEmailPrint<br>4220 words

The Odyssey<br>directed by Christopher Nolan.<br>Show More

Show More

Christopher Nolan&rsquo;s $250 million action movie version of Homer&rsquo;s ancient Greek poem is an entertaining way to hide from the high temperatures for a few hours. Nolan&rsquo;s trademark jumps and twists in the narrative structure are relatively easy to follow, and appropriate for The Odyssey, a narrative of tales nested in tales. My teenagers had a good time. Unlike some of Nolan&rsquo;s other films, The Odyssey is not boring, thanks to the source material, which is impossible to mess up entirely. It&rsquo;s a family-friendly audiovisual spectacle, like an elaborate Fourth of July fireworks display – and with about the same level of narrative and emotional depth.<br>As in his previous films, Nolan is interested in the discontinuities of space and time, in magic, tricks, craft, technology, rivalry, substitution, masks, miscommunication, what we remember and what we choose to forget. Yet again, survival is portrayed as a kind of triumph. Yet again, there are long, claustrophobic scenes of drowning and near-drowning, and technically impressive episodes in which buildings are engulfed in flames and vehicles explode. Yet again, we watch a male character&rsquo;s desperate quest to recover and/or avenge a female love object. I had hoped that Nolan&rsquo;s affinity with these Homeric themes might push him to new creative heights, and enable him to conjure more believable characters. But The Odyssey features his usual combination of grandiosity and superficiality. Without a tub of wax for my ears – which Himesh Patel&rsquo;s ever anxious Eurylochus, Odysseus&rsquo;s doomed right-hand man, uses to sail safely past the Sirens – I was exposed to the full din of thumping sticks, staffs, swords and clashing armour, thunderbolts, crashing waves, grunts, screams, toppling palaces and burning temples. But unlike Matt Damon, the wax-free Odysseus who is tied to the mast as he is conveyed past the Sirens (naked ladies reclining on some uncomfortable-looking rocks), I gazed at the shipwrecks and bloodbaths without any agony of emotion. My eyes stayed dry, even for Argos the dog – whose adorableness as a puppy is predictably amped up to suit our animal-loving times. If only the human characters had been treated with such serious attention.<br>The Homeric epic was already an adaptation. The poem used a relatively new technology – the written alphabet – to rework existing mythical traditions, reshaping the story of a veteran&rsquo;s homecoming to resonate with the complex concerns of Greek-speakers in the archaic period, an era of migration, colonisation and urbanisation. Some seventh-century BCE Greek communities were ruled by an oligarchy, some by a single man. The poem traces the tension between the needs and desires of groups of men – Odysseus&rsquo; comrades or the suitors of his wife, Penelope – and those of a single powerful and cunning man, who wants to rule them all and win eternal fame for himself. In a period of cultural and technological change, it explores a fantasy of going back in time as well as space, while also showing its dangers and costs. The poem wrestles with the challenges of encountering strangers, of entering their homes and welcoming or rejecting them from one&rsquo;s own. The contemporary resonances are obvious and Nolan&rsquo;s movie hints at some of them, in interesting if scattered ways. But the film&rsquo;s vision is too confused, its characters too underdeveloped, to deliver what it half-promises in terms of big ideas – although it is very good at conveying big bangs and big giants.<br>Adaptations needn&rsquo;t and shouldn&rsquo;t follow the original with anything like the exactitude of a translation. Some of the best radically transform or resist the source material, providing what Harold Bloom called &lsquo;strong misreadings&rsquo; of their ancestors. The most memorable creative responses to The Odyssey – such as Euripides&rsquo; Helen, Virgil&rsquo;s Aeneid, Milton&rsquo;s Paradise Lost, Joyce&rsquo;s Ulysses, Walcott&rsquo;s Omeros,...

rsquo nolan odyssey uncomplicated technology poem

Related Articles