Adaptive Agentic Attacks on LLM Vulnerability Detectors via Adversarial Comments

tcp_handshaker1 pts0 comments

[2607.24964] ALIBI: Adaptive Agentic Attacks on LLM-Based Vulnerability Detectors via Adversarial Code Comments

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:2607.24964 (cs)

[Submitted on 27 Jul 2026]

Title:ALIBI: Adaptive Agentic Attacks on LLM-Based Vulnerability Detectors via Adversarial Code Comments

Authors:Zixuan Wu, Cristina Nita-Rotaru<br>View a PDF of the paper titled ALIBI: Adaptive Agentic Attacks on LLM-Based Vulnerability Detectors via Adversarial Code Comments, by Zixuan Wu and 1 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models are increasingly deployed for security-sensitive tasks such as vulnerability detection and code review. Their reliance on natural-language context embedded in source code exposes a previously underexplored attack surface: adversarial comments that can influence a detector's reasoning without changing program behavior. We study LLM-based vulnerability detectors against a new adversary: a coding agent that implements new functionality, deliberately introduces vulnerabilities, and strategically inserts adversarial source-code comments to evade detection.

We present ALIBI, an automated adaptive black-box attack framework that generates and iteratively refines adversarial comments using detector reasoning and feedback. We transform real-world vulnerability-fixing commits into coding tasks and evaluate four representative LLM-based vulnerability detectors, ranging from specialized open-weight reasoning models to frontier multi-agent systems. All evaluated detectors are highly vulnerable: attack success rates exceed 90% across 125 real-world null-pointer dereference vulnerabilities, reaching 100% on one system. The framework also generalizes beyond this vulnerability class. Adversarial comments steering detector reasoning or fabricating external tool results prove most effective, while iterative refinement based on detector feedback further increases attack success. Finally, prompt-level defenses provide limited robustness against adaptive attacks, whereas architectural isolation and pre-detector comment sanitization substantially improve resilience. Our findings expose a fundamental attack surface in current LLM-based vulnerability detectors and motivate security-aware designs that carefully calibrate trust between natural-language context and program evidence.

Subjects:

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2607.24964 [cs.CR]

(or<br>arXiv:2607.24964v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24964

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Zixuan Wu [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:13:28 UTC (129 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ALIBI: Adaptive Agentic Attacks on LLM-Based Vulnerability Detectors via Adversarial Code Comments, by Zixuan Wu and 1 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CR

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers?...

toggle vulnerability code detectors adversarial comments

Related Articles