Americans worry robots will take jobs, but not theirs, survey shows | Semafor
Home<br>Politics<br>Business<br>Technology<br>Energy<br>Gulf<br>China<br>Africa<br>Security<br>Media<br>CEO Signal<br>Semafor World Economy<br>EventsEmail BriefingsShows
AboutSpeaker BureauCareers<br>Privacy© 2026 Semafor Inc.
D.C.<br>BXL<br>Lagos<br>Riyadh<br>Beijing<br>SG<br>Events Email Briefings
Intelligence for the New World Economy<br>D.C.<br>BXL<br>Lagos<br>Riyadh<br>Beijing<br>SG
Intelligence for the New World Economy
Semafor World Economy
From Semafor Technology<br>In your inbox, 2x per week
Sign up
Exclusive / Americans worry robots will take jobs, but not theirs
J.D. CapeloutoTech Reporter
Updated Jul 31, 2026, 12:09pm EDTJul 31, 2026, 12:09pm EDT<br>PostEmailWhatsappCopy link
Share
Daniel Cole/Reuters
Americans think robots will start taking people’s jobs in the next five years — but not their jobs.<br>That’s the finding of a new nationwide survey, shared exclusively with Semafor, by advisory firm Breakwater Strategy and YouGov. It offers an early snapshot of Americans’ attitudes toward robots in various corners of everyday life.<br>“There’s a lot of anxiety about job displacement, but somehow it feels like at the moment, the notion of robotics is still a little bit distant,” Steve Weber, a Breakwater partner and UC Berkeley professor, told Semafor.<br>Most people would be comfortable with robots working in grocery store stock rooms or loading docks, where they’re out of sight. But only 39% are cool with them working at a self-checkout area.<br>Public sentiment toward robots will probably improve as deployments ramp up beyond pilot programs.<br>Barclays researcher Zornitsa Todorova compared it to the rollout of large language models, in which attitudes “wax and wane” as the public mood swings between excitement and deep anxiety over the tech’s impact on jobs, privacy, safety, and security.
AD
Sign up for Semafor Technology<br>What’s next in the new era of tech.<br>2x per week Read it now.<br>Email address
Sign up for freeSign inAlready subscribed? Sign in and we won’t show you this message again.<br>Take me back to the article