Increasing Value From Compute - Bob Gelfond
Bob Gelfond
SubscribeSign in
Increasing Value From Compute
Bob Gelfond<br>Jul 22, 2026
Share
This is the full design paper behind the brief essay “Free-Market Money Redux.” The idea dates to a September 2012 patent filing and a June 2013 Wall Street Journal piece, “Free-Market Money, Courtesy of the Web.” Comments are open; I am looking for the flaws.<br>Cloud computing has become a fundamental economic resource and could serve as the basis for a new form of money with advantages over both fiat money and existing cryptocurrencies.<br>A less risky way to finance cloud infrastructure. Unlike dollar debt, a compute-backed liability is closely tied to the compute asset it finances.
Fuel for AI agents. For an agent, the currency is food. Holding it both stores value and hedges its largest operating cost, something no dollar-pegged stablecoin can do.
Backed by a productive asset. A cloud currency is a claim on compute, which produces real economic output every hour it runs, unlike fiat money or cryptocurrencies that are not redeemable into an underlying productive asset.
Designed to keep or increase its value. The currency is linked to a compute benchmark and built to let holders share in advances in cloud technology.
Proven economics. Airline mileage programs, though illiquid and routinely devalued, have been valued at $240 billion globally. The three largest US programs are valued at roughly the entire market capitalization of the airlines that issue them. A transferable, non-expiring claim on compute could be worth far more.
The essence of all business is the trading of one good or service for another. Historically this might mean the trading of the milk from my cow for the wheat in your field.<br>Over time, clay tokens, representing a claim of a certain amount of a commodity, came into being. These inventions served as an intermediate good, used to make trade easier.<br>Coins were a further evolution of money. These had intrinsic value because what they were made from had value, e.g., gold, silver, lead and copper. These coins had additional utility because their size and durability made storing and transporting wealth easier. Coins do not spoil or easily burn like grain. Coins do not die like livestock and can be easily moved unlike land.<br>Money was not exclusively metals. Some societies used shells or beads but metals, particularly gold and silver, came to dominate what was deemed money around the world. The common factors for different types of money were that it be widely accepted, durable, divisible, easily transported, a stable store of value and a unit of account.<br>The invention of money preceded official government money by at least a thousand years. Governments certainly took advantage of this creation, as it was an efficient way to collect taxes and pay soldiers. Governments also soon discovered they could cheat by mixing cheaper metals into coins, i.e., debasing the currency and using the force of law to require acceptance of those coins.<br>Productivity in the mining of metals roughly matched productivity in other parts of the economy. Therefore, the supply of precious metals would approximately change proportionately with the supply of other goods. This kept prices of those goods, in terms of a certain amount of metal, roughly stable over time.<br>Discoveries of new mines did spike the supply of precious metals from time to time, temporarily lowering the value of those metals as a jump in supply hit the market. As the new supply was not continuous, it was digested over time. From about 1800-1900 in the US, the price of other goods denominated in gold hardly changed. Using different endpoints would give different results but it’s clear that over long periods, gold-backed money did not suffer the same kind of systematic one-way depreciation that fiat money has experienced.<br>Coins produced by private mints (technically tokens since they were not covered by legal tender laws) competed with government mints by not debasing their coins, for instance having more gold bullion in them than similarly valued government issued coins but slightly less than the face value of the coin so they could profit. These private issuers, competing for trust, had strong competitive reasons to produce honest money, unlike monopoly sovereign issuers.<br>Paper money was a further evolution, representing a claim on some amount of metal, typically gold or silver. This creation was also a market response that allowed for the easier use of money in commerce and the easier transport of larger amounts of wealth. The value of the paper was determined not just by the amount of metal the paper had a claim on but also the perceived credit quality of the issuer. Essentially, whether the holder of this paper could reliably redeem it for the full amount of metal upon demand.<br>Private banks produced much of the circulating paper money in the US before the Civil War, though the Continental Congress, the...