California Fails to Pass Teacher Misconduct Database Bill — ProPublica

Arrow Right

Caret

Close

Search ProPublica Search Close<br>ProPublica is a nonprofit, investigative newsroom that exposes<br>corruption. We report in all 50 states and partner with local newsrooms. Our work spurs real-world impact and has received numerous awards, including nine Pulitzer Prizes.

Topics We Cover<br>See All<br>Abortion<br>Civil Rights<br>Courts<br>Criminal Justice<br>Debt<br>Democracy<br>Education<br>Environment<br>Health Care<br>Health Insurance<br>Immigration<br>Labor<br>Mental Health<br>Military<br>Police<br>Politics<br>Pregnancy<br>Prison<br>Racial Justice<br>Regulation<br>Sex and Gender<br>Technology

Our Biggest Series<br>See All<br>Life of the Mother<br>How Abortion Bans Lead to Preventable Deaths

The New Immigration<br>How Recent Arrivals at the Border Have Changed the Country and Its Attitudes

Friends of the Court<br>SCOTUS Justices’ Beneficial Relationships With Billionaire Donors

This article was produced for ProPublica’s Local Reporting Network in partnership with KQED. Sign up for Dispatches to get stories like this one as soon as they are published.

A last-ditch legislative attempt to help California school districts keep problematic teachers out of the classroom has collapsed following opposition from unions and the state teacher licensing agency that a proposed searchable database would violate privacy and subject educators to unfair treatment.

The proposed database, introduced by a Democratic member of the State Assembly in June, would have allowed schools to see if applicants for public school teaching positions had been reported to the state after they were fired or resigned over claims of misconduct.

The California Federation of Teachers pushed back, warning that teachers could land in the database even if schools had not determined they committed serious misconduct.

“We would support legislation that targets substantiated reports of egregious misconduct,” said Tristan Brown, a lobbyist with the California Federation of Teachers. “We live in a state with Silicon Valley. The state should be able to support a system that is up to date and tracking substantiated reports of misconduct.”

Democratic Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi had proposed to make it easier for schools to screen teacher applicants after a KQED-ProPublica investigation published in May. The news outlets revealed how delays and inaction, combined with a lack of transparency, allowed educators to get new jobs after school districts reported them to the state teacher licensing agency for sexual harassment or other misconduct.

A similar effort by Republican lawmakers to address the issue also hit roadblocks earlier this year.

"When the safety of a child does not meet a legislative priority, that’s a head-scratcher for me," said Republican Assemblymember Tom Lackey, who co-authored the first attempt to create the teacher database. “I think being sympathetic to the offender is on the wrong side of this issue.”

Both bills were modeled on a law the Legislature passed in 2025 mandating the creation of a database by next summer that will allow employers to search the names of school support staff, such as bus drivers, custodians and teaching assistants, who are under investigation by their schools or have substantiated complaints of egregious misconduct.

The database for school support staff passed after months of tense negotiations. Under that system, employees’ names would be removed from the database if school investigations fail to substantiate claims of egregious misconduct. The bill passed despite opposition from unions, but the system that will be put in place is still being refined.

But that law explicitly does not apply to public school teachers.

The system currently in place for public school educators is a patchwork with a fair number of gaps. School districts have long been required to report to the state any teacher who is fired or who resigns due to misconduct. But the state’s teacher licensing agency, which collects all of those reports, is restricted by state law in what information the agency can share while it investigates. The state’s disciplinary process typically takes one year, and teachers could be hired during the investigation period without schools knowing about the claims against them.

California’s publicly accessible online database of credentialed educators does indicate, with a red-flag icon, whether those public school teachers have been disciplined by the state. But it does not explain the reason for the sanction or provide a link to any documents. It is only after the state licensing agency recommends an educator be disciplined that prospective employers can request a summary of the case and the agency’s findings.

Without such details, California school administrators must rely on teachers themselves or their previous employers to provide key information. A law passed in 2024 requires teacher candidates to share their complete job history in education and mandates that school districts...