BYOC Anywhere: The Spectrum of Bring Your Own Cloud Deployments

Blog

Engineering & Tech<br>12 min read

BYOC Anywhere: The Spectrum of Bring Your Own Cloud Deployments<br>by Kamal Gupta | July 16, 2026<br>BYOC

Control Plane

Multi Cloud

Kubernetes

Platform Engineering

Security

In the classic SaaS model, the vendor hosts the application, data plane, infrastructure, networking, and operations in its own cloud account. In BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud), that boundary shifts: the customer keeps the workload, data, network controls, audit logs, and often billing inside their own cloud estate, while the vendor still provides a managed product experience. That definition is a good start, but it is incomplete.

In practice, BYOC does not always mean "give the vendor a fresh cloud account and let them deploy."

Enterprises, regulated organizations, AI infrastructure teams, and platform engineering groups all have different constraints. Some can provide a dedicated account. Some require deployment into an existing VPC. Some only allow workloads onto approved Kubernetes clusters. Some cannot allow any internet connectivity at all.

That is why BYOC is better understood as a spectrum of deployment and operating models .

1Vendor SaaS

2BYOC-Account

3BYOC-VPC

4BYOC-K8s

5Air-gapped / disconnected

The deeper point: BYOC Anywhere is not just infrastructure placement. It is the ability to deliver, secure, operate, meter, upgrade, observe, and govern software across many customer-controlled environments.

Why customers need different BYOC flavors

Customers ask for BYOC for different reasons, and those reasons often compound.

Some want data residency and sovereignty : data must stay in a specific region, account, cloud, or jurisdiction. Others want security control : private networking, customer-owned keys, audit logs, no vendor access to raw data, and policy enforcement through their own identity and governance systems.

Some buyers care about commercial alignment . They already have committed cloud spend, reserved capacity, GPU reservations, or internal chargeback models. Running software in their own account helps them use those commitments instead of paying twice.

For AI and data-heavy workloads, the reason is often data gravity . Moving large volumes of logs, embeddings, model outputs, files, or telemetry into a vendor SaaS environment can be expensive, slow, or prohibited. BYOC keeps compute closer to the data.

Platform teams may also require standardization . They already run approved VPC patterns, Kubernetes clusters, service meshes, secrets managers, CI/CD systems, observability stacks, and supply-chain scanning. A vendor that cannot fit into those patterns creates operational friction.

Finally, regulated environments may require disconnected or air-gapped delivery , where software updates, container images, licenses, and telemetry cannot assume live internet access. Air-gapped environments require offline update workflows, mirrored repositories, and controlled artifact transfer processes. (Ubuntu's air-gapped system documentation)

The four main BYOC variants

1. BYOC-Account (Bring your own Cloud Account)

Figure 1: A standard BYOC-Account deployment model.

BYOC-Account is the most common mental model. The customer creates a dedicated cloud account, project, or subscription. The vendor deploys its data plane into that environment, usually through scoped IAM roles and deploying an agent that automates the rest (or manually through a bunch of Terraform, CloudFormation, one-off installers/scripts).

From the customer's perspective, this model feels like:

1Create account

2Approve IAM role

3Vendor deploys

4Service runs in customer cloud

This flavor works well when the customer wants clean isolation without forcing the vendor into every detail of their existing network. The customer owns the account boundary, billing, cloud logs, region choice, and many policy controls. The vendor owns the product lifecycle: deployment, scaling, health checks, upgrades, and support.

BYOC-Account is often the right starting point because it creates a strong separation of concerns. But it is not enough for customers with strict networking, routing, private endpoint, or internal platform requirements.

2. BYOC-VPC (Bring your own VPC)

Figure 2: A secure BYOC-VPC deployment with a customer-approved network boundary.

BYOC-VPC goes one level deeper: the software must run inside a customer-approved network boundary. Instead of simply deploying into a fresh account, the vendor must integrate with an existing VPC, VNet, subnet layout, routing model, DNS setup, firewall policy, private endpoints, and egress controls.

From the customer's perspective, this model feels like:

1Provide VPC / subnets

2Approve routes, endpoints, and security groups

3Deploy privately

This is important when customers require:

No public endpoints.

Private connectivity to internal systems.

Egress allowlists.

PrivateLink-style connectivity.

Centralized...