Walking to the Car Wash: The Salience Bias of LLMs in Commonsense Reasoning

theanonymousone1 pts0 comments

[2607.28478] Would You Walk to the Car Wash? Revealing the Salience Bias of Large Language Models in Commonsense Reasoning

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.28478 (cs)

[Submitted on 30 Jul 2026]

Title:Would You Walk to the Car Wash? Revealing the Salience Bias of Large Language Models in Commonsense Reasoning

Authors:Zheng Wu, Chenhao Xue, Shijie Zheng, Yijie Lu, Cheng Yang, Zhuosheng Zhang<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Would You Walk to the Car Wash? Revealing the Salience Bias of Large Language Models in Commonsense Reasoning, by Zheng Wu and Chenhao Xue and Shijie Zheng and Yijie Lu and Cheng Yang and Zhuosheng Zhang

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance in complex reasoning tasks, they have learned to heavily prioritize explicit conditions provided in the input. However, in everyday commonsense reasoning, this mechanism exposes a critical vulnerability which we term Salience Bias: models become easily hijacked by useless explicit distractors (e.g., numerical values), leading them to ignore the implicit physical or commonsense prerequisites of a task. A critical open question is whether this failure reflects a genuine gap in commonsense knowledge or merely its suppression under misleading task framing. To investigate this, we construct the SaliTrap Benchmark, a high-quality dataset across four trap dimensions. Evaluating 12 state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that all mainstream models suffer significantly from salience bias, with severity scaling with distractor density and detecting the trap often decoupled from actually avoiding it. Crucially, by re-eliciting the same models with the task framing stripped away, we show that this is overwhelmingly a failure of \textbf{knowledge suppression rather than knowledge absence}: a context-free knowledge probe alone recovers over 90\% of sycophantic-compliance failures, revealing that the requisite commonsense is intrinsically present but actively crowded out by salient distractors that lure the model into over-compliant, unnecessary computation. Building on this diagnosis, we further show that lightweight, inference-time prompting alone substantially closes the gap without any retraining. Our findings relocate the bottleneck of commonsense reasoning failures from model competence to elicitation, and we release SaliTrap as a testbed for this blind spot. The codes are available at this https URL.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2607.28478 [cs.CL]

(or<br>arXiv:2607.28478v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.28478

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Zheng Wu [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:30:08 UTC (2,441 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Would You Walk to the Car Wash? Revealing the Salience Bias of Large Language Models in Commonsense Reasoning, by Zheng Wu and Chenhao Xue and Shijie Zheng and Yijie Lu and Cheng Yang and Zhuosheng Zhang<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that...

toggle commonsense reasoning models arxiv salience

Related Articles