Beyond the Final Prompt: How Conversation Context Changes AI Answers

bentannenbaum1 pts0 comments

[2608.02556] Beyond the Final Prompt: Measuring the Effect of Within-Conversation Context on AI Answers

Skip to main content

System maintenance August 4th and 5th<br>Learn more<br>&times;

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search &middot; Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:2608.02556 (cs)

[Submitted on 3 Aug 2026]

Title:Beyond the Final Prompt: Measuring the Effect of Within-Conversation Context on AI Answers

Authors:Benjamin Tannenbaum<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond the Final Prompt: Measuring the Effect of Within-Conversation Context on AI Answers, by Benjamin Tannenbaum

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:An isolated final user message is often treated as the query in evaluations of AI systems. In a conversation, however, the actionable request may be distributed across preceding turns. We directly test whether that omitted within-conversation context changes answers. For each of 180 English multi-turn conversations sampled from a governed commercial corpus and the public PRISM dataset, we hold the final user message and requested answer model constant while generating three answers: one from the full role-labelled conversation, one from the final message alone, and one from the final message plus a prefix-only reconstruction capped at 160 words. A separately requested judge model evaluates answers under randomized labels. The prespecified primary endpoint is a material difference that could change what the user does, rather than a difference in style or detail. After inverse-probability weighting to the eligible cohorts, the full-conversation and isolated-final answers differ materially in 44.7% of cases (95% bootstrap CI 33.8% to 56.1%). Full-conversation answers score 0.49 points higher on a 0 to 4 request-satisfaction scale (0.32 to 0.67). Adding the compressed prefix reduces the material-difference rate to 30.8% (20.2% to 42.1%), a 13.9-point reduction (4.9% to 24.1%), and reduces the mean satisfaction gap to 0.01 points (-0.12 to 0.13). Yet compression is not equivalent to the complete dialogue context: almost one third of answers remain materially different. An order-swapped repeat on 48 cases yields 91.7% agreement and kappa = 0.83 for the primary decision. The study concerns preceding turns in the same conversation and does not test persistent memory across separate conversations.

Comments:<br>8 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables. Companion to arXiv:2607.22392

Subjects:

Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2608.02556 [cs.IR]

(or<br>arXiv:2608.02556v1 [cs.IR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02556

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Benjamin Tannenbaum [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Mon, 3 Aug 2026 17:40:46 UTC (14 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond the Final Prompt: Measuring the Effect of Within-Conversation Context on AI Answers, by Benjamin Tannenbaum<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.IR

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are...

toggle conversation answers final arxiv context

Related Articles