LLM DeepSWE Pareto Frontier

ijidak1 pts0 comments

DeepSWEToggle theme

Leaderboard

v1.1v1

CostOutput tokensAgent steps

113 tasks · updated August 6, 2026Configs(50/52)

DeepSWE score$0$5.00$100%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%Avg cost per taskmost efficient ↗gpt-5.6-lunaMEDIUMgemini-3.1-proHIGHclaude-sonnet-4.6HIGHkimi-k2.7-codegpt-5.6-terraMEDIUMgemini-3.5-flashMEDIUMglm-5.2MAXclaude-sonnet-5HIGHgemini-3.6-flashHIGHgpt-5.4XHIGHclaude-opus-4.8HIGHmuse-spark-1.1XHIGHdeepseek-v4-flashMAXgrok-4.5HIGHgpt-5.5MEDIUMqwen3.8-maxXHIGHgpt-5.6-solMEDIUMkimi-k3MAXclaude-fable-5HIGHclaude-opus-5MAX

v1.1v1

BestAll effort levels

Models(20/20)<br>Model

Pass@1<br>Avg cost<br>Out tok<br>Steps

claude-opus-5[max]<br>74%±4%

Avg cost $11.84Out tok 118kSteps 99<br>74%±4%<br>$11.84<br>118k<br>99

gpt-5.6-sol[max]<br>73%±3%

Avg cost $8.39Out tok 60kSteps 61<br>73%±3%<br>$8.39<br>60k<br>61

claude-fable-5[max]<br>70%±4%

Avg cost $21.63Out tok 119kSteps 88<br>70%±4%<br>$21.63<br>119k<br>88

gpt-5.6-terra[max]<br>70%±3%

Avg cost $3.96Out tok 72kSteps 76<br>70%±3%<br>$3.96<br>72k<br>76

kimi-k3[max]<br>69%±5%

Avg cost $4.65Out tok 81kSteps 98<br>69%±5%<br>$4.65<br>81k<br>98

gpt-5.6-luna[max]<br>67%±4%

Avg cost $0.61Out tok 73kSteps 102<br>67%±4%<br>$0.61<br>73k<br>102

gpt-5.5[xhigh]<br>67%±6%

Avg cost $7.23Out tok 46kSteps 82<br>67%±6%<br>$7.23<br>46k<br>82

claude-opus-4.8[max]<br>59%±2%

Avg cost $13.22Out tok 135kSteps 120<br>59%±2%<br>$13.22<br>135k<br>120

qwen3.8-max[xhigh]<br>57%±3%

Avg cost $3.73Out tok 95kSteps 111<br>57%±3%<br>$3.73<br>95k<br>111

claude-sonnet-5[max]<br>54%±4%

Avg cost $26.40Out tok 214kSteps 268<br>54%±4%<br>$26.40<br>214k<br>268

grok-4.5[high]<br>54%±2%

Avg cost $2.42Out tok 36kSteps 61<br>54%±2%<br>$2.42<br>36k<br>61

deepseek-v4-flash[max]<br>53%±4%

Avg cost $0.10Out tok 108kSteps 153<br>53%±4%<br>$0.10<br>108k<br>153

muse-spark-1.1[xhigh]<br>53%±3%

Avg cost $2.36Out tok 74kSteps 96<br>53%±3%<br>$2.36<br>74k<br>96

gpt-5.4[xhigh]<br>52%±2%

Avg cost $5.65Out tok 71kSteps 70<br>52%±2%<br>$5.65<br>71k<br>70

gemini-3.6-flash[high]<br>49%±5%

Avg cost $3.53Out tok 97kSteps 108<br>49%±5%<br>$3.53<br>97k<br>108

glm-5.2[max]<br>44%±2%

Avg cost $3.92Out tok 78kSteps 129<br>44%±2%<br>$3.92<br>78k<br>129

gemini-3.5-flash[medium]<br>37%±2%

Avg cost $7.34Out tok 276kSteps 86<br>37%±2%<br>$7.34<br>276k<br>86

kimi-k2.7-code<br>31%±1%

Avg cost $2.82Out tok 59kSteps 149<br>31%±1%<br>$2.82<br>59k<br>149

claude-sonnet-4.6[high]<br>30%±4%

Avg cost $5.52Out tok 76kSteps 134<br>30%±4%<br>$5.52<br>76k<br>134

gemini-3.1-pro[high]<br>12%±2%

Avg cost $9.48Out tok 196kSteps 81<br>12%±2%<br>$9.48<br>196k<br>81

0%20%40%60%80%

All models run on mini-swe-agent for consistency. Read why.

Today's leading public coding benchmarks are starting to saturate at the frontier: top models cluster within a narrow score band where adjacent configurations often overlap on confidence intervals. DeepSWE is a long-horizon software engineering benchmark built to separate them. It delivers four advances over existing public benchmarks:<br>Contamination free : Tasks are written from scratch, not adapted from existing commits or PRs, so no model has seen the solution during pretraining.<br>High diversity : Tasks span a broad pool of 91 repositories across 5 languages.<br>Real-world complexity : Prompts are ~half the length of SWE-bench Pro's, yet solutions require 5.5x more code and ~2x more output tokens.<br>Reliable verification : Verifiers are hand-written to test software behavior rather than implementation details.<br>The result is a benchmark that reflects how today's frontier coding agents actually perform in software engineering work.

Task Examples<br>Abort pending body reads on shutdown<br>Ensure interrupted request and response body reads, formData parsing, and discarded timers abort cleanly during shutdown.<br>capricorn86/happy-domtypescript<br>Fix PromQL label sorting across typed and untyped values<br>PromQL label sorting must order mixed typed and untyped label values with stable typed comparison rules.<br>prometheus/prometheusgo<br>Add config file parsing to Cliffy commands<br>Add command-level config file loading, parsing, merging, and precedence handling.<br>c4spar/cliffytypescript<br>Add deterministic map conflict detection to Y.Map writes<br>Add strict, deterministic conflict detection for Y.Map key writes with collect and error policies.<br>yjs/yjsjavascript<br>Add trap coredump generation to wasmi<br>Generate opt-in Wasm coredumps on traps and attach the bytes to errors.<br>wasmi-labs/wasmirust<br>Add XML diff, patch, and merge operations to etree<br>Add recursive XML diffing, patch generation and application, reverse patching, three-way merge, and diff summaries.<br>beevik/etreego

All 113 tasks

Read the full blog<br>Open<br>01IntroductionWhy a new benchmark

02OverviewWhat separates DeepSWE

03MethodologyHow tasks and verifiers are built

04ResultsWhere frontier models diverge

05Qualitative analysisHow each frontier model fails

06Limitations & future workWhat we'd do differently

Sign up for leaderboard updates<br>New frontier models are added to the DeepSWE leaderboard as they're released.

Notify me

cost frontier deepswe tasks models claude

Related Articles