[2608.05889] The em-dash em-beds in Congress: A population-level rise in em-dash frequency in U.S. congressional press releases at the dawn of the large-language-model era, 2021-2025

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

arXiv:2608.05889 (cs)

[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]

Title:The em-dash em-beds in Congress: A population-level rise in em-dash frequency in U.S. congressional press releases at the dawn of the large-language-model era, 2021-2025

Authors:Przemysław Czuma (Polish Association for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine)<br>View a PDF of the paper titled The em-dash em-beds in Congress: A population-level rise in em-dash frequency in U.S. congressional press releases at the dawn of the large-language-model era, 2021-2025, by Przemys{\l}aw Czuma (Polish Association for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine)

View PDF

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can leave small stylistic traces in text written with their help. The most discussed is the em-dash (U+2014), especially the unspaced form word---word, which is normal in typeset English prose but unusual in U.S. press writing, where AP style calls for spaced dashes. This study asks whether that trace is measurable in congressional press releases. In a preregistered design (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/U5NEY), 146,239 scraper-sourced releases from 480 House and Senate offices (2021-2025, the open congress-press dataset) were analyzed: density of unspaced prose-form em-dashes per 1,000 characters of cleaned text, Poisson/negative-binomial models with a length offset, clustering by office. Density stayed within 0.10-0.12 per 1,000 characters through 2021-2024, then rose to 0.217 in 2025, more than twice the four-year baseline; the share of releases with such an em-dash rose from ~13% to 24.8%. The primary frequency ratio (2023-2025 vs 2021-2022) was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28-1.93; exact registered cut-off: 1.528), just above the prespecified 1.5x threshold. The rise was net-new (hyphen density stable), held within authors (75.6% of 262 continuous offices increased; p ~ 1e-16) and in a closed panel of 224 offices, and survived falsification tests: three placebo cut-offs were null, the pipeline showed no step at the 2024/2025 boundary, and continuing offices carried the rise. A segmented regression finds no step at the ChatGPT cut-off but a clear post-period acceleration; the 2025 rise is symmetric across parties and chambers. Because the registered validation gate was formally breached, the full preregistered decision rule was not met; the interpretation (broad diffusion of LLM-assisted writing as the models matured) is offered as exploratory. The em-dash remains a population-level marker, not a per-release authorship detector, and the design supports no causal claim.

Comments:<br>Preregistered study (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/U5NEY%29%3B deviations from the registered plan, including a formal validation-gate breach, are disclosed in Section 4.6. Companion study: arXiv:2606.29540. 3 figures, 4 tables

Subjects:

Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2608.05889 [cs.DL]

(or<br>arXiv:2608.05889v1 [cs.DL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05889

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Przemysław Czuma [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 11:12:48 UTC (627 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled The em-dash em-beds in Congress: A population-level rise in em-dash frequency in U.S. congressional press releases at the dawn of the large-language-model era, 2021-2025, by Przemys{\l}aw Czuma (Polish Association for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine)<br>View PDF

view license

Current browse context:

cs.DL

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.AI<br>cs.CL<br>cs.CY

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is...