Buffett indicator - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Search

Search

Donate

Create account

Log in

Personal tools

Donate

Create account

Log in

Buffett indicator

5 languages

فارسی<br>日本語<br>한국어<br>Polski<br>中文

Edit links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aggregate stock market valuation metric

Not to be confused with Buffett Rule.

Wilshire 5000 to GDP ratio

The Buffett indicator (or the Buffett metric , or the Market capitalization-to-GDP ratio )[1] is a valuation multiple used to assess how expensive or cheap the aggregate stock market is at a given point in time.[1][2] It was proposed as a metric by investor Warren Buffett in 2001, who called it "probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment", and its modern form compares the capitalization of the US Wilshire 5000 index to US GDP."}},"i":0}}]}'>[a][5][3] It is widely followed by the financial media as a valuation measure for the US market in both its absolute,[6][3][5] and de-trended forms.[7][4]

The indicator set an all-time high during the so-called "everything bubble", crossing the 200% level in February 2021;[6][4] a level that Buffett warned if crossed, was "playing with fire".[8][3]

History<br>[edit]

On 10 December 2001, Buffett proposed the metric in a Fortune essay co-authored with journalist Carol Loomis.[8] In the essay, Buffett presented a chart going back 80 years that showed the value of all "publicly traded securities" in the US as a percentage of "US GNP".[8] Buffett said of the metric: "Still, it is probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment. And as you can see, nearly two years ago the ratio rose to an unprecedented level. That should have been a very strong warning signal".[8]

Buffett explained that for the annual return of US securities to materially exceed the annual growth of US GNP for a protracted period of time: "you need to have the line go straight off the top of the chart. That won't happen".[8] Buffett finished the essay by outlining the levels he believed the metric showed favorable or poor times to invest: "For me, the message of that chart is this: If the percentage relationship falls to the 70% or 80% area, buying stocks is likely to work very well for you. If the ratio approaches 200%–as it did in 1999 and a part of 2000–you are playing with fire".[8][3]

Buffett's metric became known as the "Buffett Indicator", and has continued to receive widespread attention in the financial media,[6][1][9][10] and in modern finance textbooks.[11][12][13]

In 2018, finance author Mark Hulbert writing in the Wall Street Journal, listed the Buffett indicator as one of his "Eight Best Predictors of the Long-Term Market".[2]

A study by two European academics published in May, 2022 found the Buffett Indicator "explains a large fraction of ten-year return variation for the majority of countries outside the United States".[14] The study examined 10-year periods in fourteen developed markets, in most cases with data starting in 1973. The Buffett Indicator forecasted an average of 83% of returns across all nations and periods, though the predictive value ranged from a low of 42% to as high as 93% depending on the specific nation. Accuracy was lower in nations with smaller stock markets.

Theory<br>[edit]

Buffett acknowledged that his metric was a simple one and thus had "limitations", however the underlying theoretical basis for the indicator, particularly in the US, is considered reasonable.[8][2]

For example, studies have shown a consistent and strong annual correlation between US GDP growth, and US corporate profit growth,[15] and which has increased materially since the Great Recession of 2007–2009.[16] GDP captures effects where a given industry's margins increase materially for a period, but the effect of reduced wages and costs, dampening margins in other industries.[15]

The same studies show a poor annual correlation between US GDP growth and US equity returns, underlining Buffett's belief that when equity prices get ahead of corporate profits (via the GNP/GDP proxy), poor returns will follow.[15] The indicator has also been advocated for its ability to reduce the effects of "aggressive accounting" or "adjusted profits", that distort the value of corporate profits in the price–earnings ratio or EV/EBITDA ratio metrics; and that it is not affected by share buybacks (which don't affect aggregate corporate profits).[17]

The Buffett indicator has been calculated for most international stock markets, however, caveats apply as other markets can have less stable compositions of listed corporations (e.g. the Saudi Arabia metric was materially impacted by the 2018 listing of Aramco), or a significantly higher/lower composition of private vs public firms (e.g. Germany vs. Switzerland), and therefore comparisons across international markets using the indicator as a comparative measure of valuation are not appropriate.[18]

The Buffett indicator has also been calculated for...