ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidence

simonpure1 pts0 comments

[2605.26340] ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidence

Skip to main content

arXiv is now an independent nonprofit!<br>Learn more<br>&times;

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search &middot; Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2605.26340 (cs)

[Submitted on 25 May 2026]

Title:ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidence

Authors:Rui Meng, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Jiefeng Chen, Chun-Liang Li, Palash Goyal, Mihir Parmar, Yiwen Song, Yale Song, Rajarishi Sinha, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Burak Gokturk, Jinsung Yoon, Tomas Pfister<br>View a PDF of the paper titled ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidence, by Rui Meng and 12 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Autonomous research agents produce competitive solutions and professional-looking manuscripts, yet their outputs contain verifiability failures undetectable by surface-level evaluation: fabricated citations, unreproducible scores, and method descriptions that diverge from the implementation. We address this through three contributions. First, Chain-of-Evidence (CoE), a verifiability framework requiring every claim to be traceable to its evidence source. Second, ScientistOne, an end-to-end autonomous research system that maintains evidence chains by construction throughout literature review, solution discovery, and paper writing. Third, CoE Audit, a post-hoc audit whose four integrity checks -- score verification, specification violation, reference verification, and method-code alignment -- apply uniformly to all systems. Across 75 papers spanning five systems and five frontier research tasks, every baseline exhibits at least one systematic failure mode: hallucinated reference rates reach 21%, score verification passes in as few as 42% of papers, and method-code alignment ranges from 20% to 80%. ScientistOne achieves zero hallucinated references (0/337), perfect score verification (12/12), and the highest method-code alignment (14/15), while matching or exceeding human expert performance on all five tasks. ScientistOne further generalizes to six additional tasks spanning medical imaging, fine-grained recognition, 3D perception, and language modeling, achieving state-of-the-art on Parameter Golf and gold medals on MLE-Bench tasks where baselines fail entirely.

Comments:<br>Project website: this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2605.26340 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2605.26340v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26340

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Rui Meng [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Mon, 25 May 2026 21:30:27 UTC (5,073 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidence, by Rui Meng and 12 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.CL<br>cs.MA

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers?...

toggle arxiv scientistone research evidence autonomous

Related Articles