The AI Revolution — History Repeating Itself — On Economics
Skip to main content
The AI Revolution — History Repeating Itself — On Economics
Get link
Other Apps
July 29, 2026
This article turns from sentience to economics — and to the social and political currents that come with it.
The first article in this series argued that today's AI is not sentient: it is a good technology built from statistics, marketing and scale. This one asks a different set of questions — what AI is worth, who gains from it, and who ends up paying. As in the first article, I asked my AI committee to draw up a shortlist of developments that reshaped economies and societies. Eight were proposed; five were chosen by almost every model, and the sixth was a tie that I resolved with my committee of three AIs. That shortlist, with sources, is in Appendix A.
Across those six developments (described in Appendix A), a consistent pattern emerges — one worth holding in mind as we turn to AI:
1. Early disruption precedes long-term benefit. Each transformation created significant initial costs. Mechanisation displaced artisans, electrification devalued older machinery and skills, digitalisation eliminated clerical and production work, printing displaced scribes, and public-health measures required expensive infrastructure. Oceanic globalisation was far more destructive, involving conquest, disease, slavery and dispossession.
2. Pioneers and investors do not always capture the value they create.
Some inventors, entrepreneurs and early investors failed financially despite creating lasting technologies and infrastructure. Railways are a strong example: many pioneering companies entered bankruptcy, receivership or reorganisation, while their tracks continued operating under new ownership. Gutenberg lost control of his printing equipment, and many dot-com companies failed even though their investments helped build the digital economy. Early investors may bear much of the risk while later businesses and society capture the long-term value.
3. Technology alone was insufficient.
The greatest benefits appeared only after societies reorganised around the new development. Electricity required grids and redesigned factories; automobiles required roads; digital technologies required new business processes and telecommunications networks; public health required sewers, clean water and organised institutions. Adoption was therefore gradual rather than instantaneous.
4. Large upfront investment created shared infrastructure.
Most developments depended on expensive systems that could serve entire economies: factories, railways, electrical grids, roads, ports, printing networks, telecommunications, sanitation systems and healthcare programmes. Once established, these systems lowered costs for many subsequent activities.
5. Costs fell and scale increased.
Each transformation drove down the cost of producing goods, moving people and cargo, transmitting information, coordinating organisations, accessing knowledge or preventing disease — and as costs fell, scale grew. Production moved from workshops to factories, knowledge from manuscripts to mass printing, trade from regional routes to global networks, and computing from isolated machines to worldwide platforms. Organisations became larger, markets broader and economic activity more interconnected.
6. Labour was displaced, reorganised — and unevenly rewarded.
Older occupations declined while new industries and professions emerged: agricultural and craft work gave way to factories, transport, engineering, administration, healthcare, communications and software. The central effect was not the destruction of jobs but a continuing shift in the kind of work people did. The gains, however, were shared unequally — owners of capital, industrial powers and early adopters tended to benefit first, while workers, colonised populations and poorer communities bore a disproportionate share of the costs.
7. Knowledge became an increasingly important economic resource.
Printing allowed ideas to circulate more widely, while digital networks accelerated the storage, copying and transmission of information. Public health also depended on the systematic application of scientific knowledge. Economic progress increasingly came from education, research, communication and organisational capability rather than physical production alone.
8. Urbanisation and complex societies became possible.
Industry concentrated workers in cities, transport and electricity supported dense economic centres, and sanitation made large urban populations safer. Modern cities, hospitals, universities, factories and offices depend on several of these transformations operating together.
9. Every solution created new risks.
Industrialisation and motorisation produced pollution and fossil-fuel dependence; global trade helped spread disease and exploitation; printing and digital media accelerated misinformation;...