[2608.09802] SWE-Bench ProMax: Benchmarking Agents on Large-Scale Multilingual Code Refactoring

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.09802 (cs)

[Submitted on 10 Aug 2026]

Title:SWE-Bench ProMax: Benchmarking Agents on Large-Scale Multilingual Code Refactoring

Authors:Yuling Shi, Jinghan Xu, Kelin Fu, Wenhao Zeng, Shilin He, Lei Zhang, Yue Liu, Zelin Zhao, Terry Yue Zhuo, Jialun Cao, Siyu Ye, Tianyu Liu, Kai Cai, Shing-Chi Cheung, Xiaodong Gu<br>View a PDF of the paper titled SWE-Bench ProMax: Benchmarking Agents on Large-Scale Multilingual Code Refactoring, by Yuling Shi and 14 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:As AI coding agents take on increasingly complex, long-horizon software engineering tasks, existing benchmarks are rapidly saturating and their evaluation quality has come under serious scrutiny: a recent audit found that nearly 60% of unsolved SWE-bench Verified instances contain flawed tests -- either overly narrow tests that reject correct solutions or overly broad tests that check unstated requirements -- and that frontier models can verbatim reproduce gold patches from training data. Code refactoring, which requires coordinated, behavior-preserving changes across many files, offers a substantially harder and more realistic test of agent capability, yet remains underserved by current benchmarks. We introduce SWE-Bench ProMax, an expert-curated, multilingual code refactoring benchmark of 170 instances drawn from real commits across seven programming languages (Python, Java, TypeScript, Go, C, C++, and Rust). Every instance undergoes rigorous, multi-stage curation that directly addresses the quality problems identified in prior benchmarks: issue descriptions are rewritten from scratch to provide precise, unambiguous specifications, and test suites are manually reviewed to remove overly narrow and overly broad tests. Tasks with insufficient complexity or limited cross-file scope are filtered out, yielding a benchmark of challenging, large-scale refactoring tasks that average 11.4 modified files and 261.6 lines of code per instance, substantially exceeding the scale of existing benchmarks. Experiments with frontier models under two agent scaffolds show that the best model achieves only 41.2% resolve rate, confirming that SWE-Bench ProMax presents a meaningful and unsaturated challenge for current AI coding agents. Our benchmark is available at this https URL.

Comments:<br>Published as a conference paper at COLM 2026

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2608.09802 [cs.CL]

(or<br>arXiv:2608.09802v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.09802

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Yuling Shi [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 16:23:19 UTC (308 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled SWE-Bench ProMax: Benchmarking Agents on Large-Scale Multilingual Code Refactoring, by Yuling Shi and 14 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.SE

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere...