One person's AI productivity is everyone else's burden

SubscribeSign in

AI 'productivity pollution': the hidden tax on everyone<br>One person's AI-fueled productivity causes extra work for everyone else. It's time to stop the delusional thinking about AI.<br>Aug 12, 2026<br>∙ Paid

Share

SILICON VALLEY, CALIFORNIA (AUGUST 12, 2026) — Early refrigerators ran on ammonia, methyl chloride, and sulfur dioxide. These gases were toxic, flammable, and deadly to families that owned refrigerators. So in 1928, Thomas Midgley Jr. solved the problem by inventing chlorofluorocarbons to replace the toxic gases used in refrigerators.<br>Over the ensuing decades, chlorofluorocarbons from refrigerators destroyed the Earth’s ozone layer, the ultraviolet shield protecting every living thing on Earth. The depletion of the ozone layer dramatically increased UV-B radiation reaching Earth’s surface, leading to higher rates of skin cancer, cataracts, and immune suppression in humans, severe damage to marine food chains and terrestrial ecosystems, and a big shift in Southern Hemisphere climate patterns. (The ozone layer’s depletion was reversed by the 1987 Montreal Protocol, a global treaty that phased out the production and use of chlorofluorocarbons and other ozone-depleting halocarbons, allowing stratospheric ozone concentrations to gradually recover. Full recovery is not expected until roughly 2050.)<br>Millions of consumers buying chlorofluorocarbon-based refrigerators to solve their individual, personal home pollution risk caused global pollution that harmed the entire planet.<br>Now, something comparable is happening with AI.<br>Call it “productivity pollution.” One person’s AI-fueled productivity increase is lowering everybody else’s productivity.<br>How “productivity pollution” works

A podcast from The Economist magazine called “The Intelligence” reported on a phenomenon in Britain that’s surely global: People are using AI to cope with the confusion and complexity of dealing with government bureaucracy.<br>Great, right? Well, not if you’re the bureaucracy.<br>The podcast described the crisis like this: Government procedures for filing employment tribunal claims, submitting planning objections, applying for benefits, appealing parking tickets, and challenging rent increases under the Renters’ Rights Act are complex and confusing. So citizens are using AI to not only deal with the complexity, but also find and take advantage of obscure rules and loopholes.<br>As a result, government workers are being overwhelmed by the number and complexity of citizen inputs. Because they’re overwhelmed, fewer requests or claims are being processed. And so the massive productivity gains of citizens aren’t resulting in the outcomes they wanted because their individual productivity reduced the productivity of the system.<br>This is happening in business, too.<br>READ: The Attachment Economy, Computerworld, Gastronomad newsletter, Gastronomad book<br>LISTEN: Superintelligent, TWiT, Gastronomad podcast<br>JOIN: The Gastronomad Experience<br>FOLLOW: Gastronomad on Surf Social, Machine Society on Surf Social, Bluesky, Reddit, Notes, Mastodon, Threads, X, Instagram, Facebook, Linkedin!<br>LOOK AT: Mike Elgan Photography

The time and trouble of creating a business report, proposal, plan, slide deck, or budget proposal used to limit their size, complexity, and frequency.<br>Now, thanks to AI, people can churn out incredibly complex business communications, ideas, and proposals in a few minutes. Using AI makes the person generating such documents super productive. But then it burdens everyone else who has to sift through those documents, teasing out hallucinations, problems, and irrelevancies, and struggling to grasp ideas that even the so-called creator hasn’t taken the time to understand. One person’s productivity is everyone else’s information overload, leading to lower productivity for the company.<br>In other words, AI creates positive personal results, but wide negative externalities.<br>The “productivity pollution” dynamic is playing out elsewhere:<br>Job applicants can use AI to apply for far more positions, burdening hiring managers and slowing the hiring process. (LinkedIn data shows applications per job posting have more than doubled since since spring 2022.) AI that’s supposed to make it easier to find a job actually makes it harder.

AI is emboldening more people to represent themselves in court and also speeding up the work of lawyers. A 2026 MIT study of 4.5 million federal civil cases found that around 18% of civil complaints now contain AI-generated text (up from essentially zero in 2023). That burdens courts and judges, who have to now check long, complex filings to see if they contain nonexistent cases or other hallucinations, slowing down justice. AI that’s supposed to make court cases quicker makes them slower.

Students use AI to write long, complex essays, forcing professors to use AI tools to process and grade them. Neither the student nor the teacher is reading the essays. The...