[2608.11694] The Wording Effect: Quantifying Two-Way Drift in LLM Benchmark Performance

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.11694 (cs)

[Submitted on 12 Aug 2026]

Title:The Wording Effect: Quantifying Two-Way Drift in LLM Benchmark Performance

Authors:Shailja Thakur, Sungeun An, Chad DeLuca, Hima Patel<br>View a PDF of the paper titled The Wording Effect: Quantifying Two-Way Drift in LLM Benchmark Performance, by Shailja Thakur and 3 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A benchmark score comes from a single phrasing of each problem. That single phrasing is treated as if it stood for the whole space of ways the same problem could be asked, but it does not. We show that rephrasing a problem while keeping its meaning and answer fixed routinely flips a model's answer in both directions, so some failures become successes and some successes become failures. We call this drift. BenchDrift generates meaning-preserving variations of benchmark problems along four axes, namely linguistic, referential, pragmatic, and structural, and measures how often, and why, correctness flips under each. Across eight models and three benchmarks (GSM8K, MMLU, MATH-Hard), we observe that drift is large in both directions. Two findings stand out. First, phrasing sensitivity does not fade as models get better. Instead, it changes sign. Weak models gain more from rephrasing than they lose, while strong models lose far more than they gain. We find that the best models on a benchmark are therefore the ones whose scores depend most on the wording they happened to be given. Second, the models largely agree on which rephrasings cost the most correct answers even though they differ in how much they drift, so fragility belongs to the rephrasing and not to the model. Furthermore, rephrasing breaks answers a model was confident about, whether the problem is made shorter or longer. Code and Data: this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2608.11694 [cs.CL]

(or<br>arXiv:2608.11694v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11694

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Shailja Thakur [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 06:05:47 UTC (1,955 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled The Wording Effect: Quantifying Two-Way Drift in LLM Benchmark Performance, by Shailja Thakur and 3 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Major funding support from