My rules for using spreadsheets - All this

And now it’s all this

I just said what I said and it was wrong

Or was taken wrong

Next post<br>Previous post

My rules for using spreadsheets

August 1, 2026 at 10:29 AM by Dr. Drang

My fundamental rule is Don’t, but a single word wouldn’t make for much of a blog post.

In what follows, I hope to explain how I’ve come to that rule and the exceptions I make to it. I’ve been thinking about how I use and don’t use spreadsheets quite a bit lately. This introspection was inspired in part by Allison Sheridan’s presentation at Macstock (which you can see on her site along with a couple of other recent spreadsheet posts) and in part by my recent use of Numbers to make difference tables and clean up a table of data.

Let’s start by considering what makes spreadsheets so attractive. Right off the bat, you’re presented with a grid of cells that act as data containers. You don’t have to define these containers, you don’t have to name them, you don’t have to initialize them—they’re just there, waiting for you to fill them as you see fit.

When it comes time to start operating on this data, you still don’t have to name the cells. You just click (or click and drag) to fill in the function arguments. The spreadsheet app fills in the appropriate row/column reference. If you want a reminder of what a cell is for, you can type a name or description in an adjacent cell. Similarly, you don’t have to figure out the appropriate order of the operations. The app works out the cell dependency chain and recalculates everything, everywhere, all at once.

And because you can set the size, color, border, and font styling of every cell, your spreadsheet can generate nice-looking tables for inserting into your reports, memos, and slideshows.

So a spreadsheet is a data store, a logic machine, and a presentation tool. Are you getting it?

But if spreadsheets are all that, where does my Don’t rule come from? There are many sources, but I’d have to say I’ve been strongly influenced by the last 10–15 years of my working life, during which time I had to analyze dozens and dozens of data sets, all of which were sent to me as Excel spreadsheets. The engineering firms that sent me the spreadsheets had created them not simply as data stores. They included some of their own analysis (which typically overlapped slightly with mine), and they formatted the spreadsheets as tables to put into their own reports. This made my work harder for a few reasons:

Because I had to make sure I understood and agreed with their analysis, I had to review all their formulas. Some of these formulas were complex—nested IF statements are easy to follow in a traditional programming language, but they’re a mess in a spreadsheet. Some were inconsistent—different rows in the same table would have different formulas, as if they were written by different people at different times or adapted from a spreadsheet on a previous project. Some of them referred to cells that were far away and required a lot of scrolling to track down. None of them—not a single one in over a decade—used cell names to help make the formulas easier to understand.

The complicated formulas mentioned above sometimes—not often, but sometimes—contained mistakes. And sometimes the formulas were correct, but the descriptions in the header cells were wrong. This meant phone calls were needed to resolve the discrepancies, further slowing the analysis.

It was common for the data to be split over two or more sheets. I think this was done mainly to make the tables fit better into the other engineers’ reports, which was fine for their purposes but not for mine. I had to recombine the data for my analyses. Also, the sheets often had complicated, multiline headers, which meant I couldn’t just export them as CSV files.

Every engineer I worked with built their spreadsheets in a different way. Those who worked for the same firm didn’t adhere to an "ABC Engineering" house style. Even individual engineers would change their spreadsheet styling from one project to the next. Basically, every spreadsheet that came in the door was sui generis, and I had to do all the data cleaning by hand. This slowed me down, not only because I couldn’t rely on automation for this step, but also because I had to double- and triple-check my work to avoid copy/paste mistakes.

Fundamentally, this experience—especially Item 1—soured me on the use of spreadsheets for anything large or complex. The engineers I was working with were smart, but their spreadsheets weren’t. My conclusion was that the simplicity of the typical click-and-drag method of assembling a spreadsheet encouraged poor organization and errors as the spreadsheets grew or were adapted to new data. It’s easy to say "Oh, I would never do that," but I’m old enough to know that I would do that. I see the ease with which I can build spreadsheets with today’s apps as a Siren song that will lead me onto the rocks.

(If you’re getting ready...