[2608.18066] On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification
Skip to main content
Search arXiv
Press Enter to search · Advanced search
-->
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2608.18066 (cs)
[Submitted on 18 Aug 2026]
Title:On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification
Authors:Qinyuan Ye, Yu Li, Yada Pruksachatkun, Jiaxin Zhang, Chien-Sheng Wu<br>View a PDF of the paper titled On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification, by Qinyuan Ye and 4 other authors
View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Memory-based self-improving agents--those that learn from an online stream of tasks and improve over time by maintaining a textual memory bank--have shown great promise in recent literature. However, the reliability aspects of these methods have been critically overlooked. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive re-evaluation of two memory-based methods, broadening the scope of evaluation along two axes: (1) including multiple runs to quantify variance, and (2) randomly shuffling the tasks to investigate the effect of task order. Through these experiments, we make two observations that expose the fragility of current methods: First, agent evaluation is inherently noisy in complex environments and on multi-step tasks, and stacking a self-improving loop on top can further amplify this noise. Second, the agent's improvement is highly dependent on task order. Prior works often adopt default orderings that impose an implicit curriculum, acting as a hidden prerequisite for success.
To better understand this fragility, we manually examine the agents' memory and hypothesize that task and environment underspecification contribute to this fragility. We validate this hypothesis by incorporating information that enables better specification, such as detailed rubrics and environment feedback, into the memory construction process. While this added information partially closes the performance degradation in previous experiments, significant gaps still remain, suggesting that other uncharacterized factors contribute to this fragility. Looking ahead, our work advocates for more rigorous evaluation protocols for self-improving agents by reporting results across multiple runs and stress-testing them under challenging conditions. Moreover, our findings on underspecification call for systems and interfaces that enable effective human oversight, preventing agents from failing in unforeseeable ways.
Comments:<br>Code: this https URL Data: this https URL
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as:<br>arXiv:2608.18066 [cs.AI]
(or<br>arXiv:2608.18066v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18066
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history<br>From: Qinyuan Ye [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 17:55:07 UTC (180 KB)
Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification, by Qinyuan Ye and 4 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
next >
new<br>recent<br>| 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs<br>cs.CL<br>cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is...