illegal solutions, today

8/18/2026

Mark Zuckerberg's AI Manifesto Shows What Little The AI Future Offers

Mark Zuckerberg of Meta fame posted a manifesto. He lays out an idea of a "future for everyone", although I don't think his group of everyone comprises those outside his tax bracket. The screed itself is too long and glazes over ideas that are inconvenient, as one might expect of a silicon valley bro archetype. It's almost certainly AI-generated, and thus should be discarded as half-thought-through slop, but let's give it the time of day. I'll break down particular pain points and how his ideology fails to accommodate the real world inside his "positive AI future."

Mark Calls His Shots (And Misses Every Time)

Let's start with the obvious: Silicon Valley at large, and Mark Zuckerberg in particular, has not had a good track record on what the next big thing is. Not even 5 years ago he renamed his entire company after an already dead project, the Metaverse. His decision to focus on Metaverse and Web3 projects has cost the company tens of billions conservatively. This man is not to be trusted with which way the literal wind is blowing, let alone what the future of society looks like.

What growth there has been in the Meta family of products has come from extremely expensive purchases of already popular services (and a bunch of much less successful things in between), and those services are nearly universally worse off for it. Meta, like Google and Microsoft, simply absorbs things and squeezes the dollars out until the next thing comes along that they can acquire or clone. So in between the acquisitions Mark is left with a lot of time to think and too much money to fail, a truly nasty combination.

This Manifesto Is Not About The Future

The article can largely be broken down into four parts: the intro (~700 words), plans for the technology (~790 words), risks of the technology (~4400 words), Meta's "philosophy" and wrap-up (~610 words). By word count, this is in no way a piece about how AI should be for everyone; instead it's a large list of all the ways Meta is "responsibly" developing this technology, or things it can't control that he feels they should get in front of. We'll still walk through his talking points, but we are not required to accept his premise. His focus betrays what the actual message is.

Intro: AI Is Cool, Trust Me! - Cool And Trustworthy Guy Mark Zuckerberg

Mark is as divorced from reality as one might expect from his ilk. His manifesto centers upon an idea of "abundant intelligence", but I don't think we are lacking intelligence in today's world. There are so many smart people doing smart things, well outside of AI development. Many of these developments come from the steady progress of scientific understanding, and our continued ability to operate on larger and larger scales. AI is not the one doing these things, people are. AI will not be what fuels an intelligence boom, it will be what kills it.

He also insists that this fantasy of "artificial super-intelligence" is just around the corner with no actual backing to that claim, as models are still failing to consistently pass many benchmarks, which they themselves are also flawed as measures. Claims of AI super-intelligence/superpowers/whatever else are not new, but are particularly galling since they've been regularly made every few weeks for the last several years. It's like the claims of the end-times being imminent; so many times we've heard the same story with no evidence that I see no reason to even pretend to believe them.

Mark then harps on how humanity has endured technological changes before, and we as a society will do it yet again! Those other revolutions didn't operate in the same way that the "AI revolution" seems to be shaking out however. In the industrial revolution, there were jobs lost in manufacturing as it became mechanized, but those jobs shifted to operating the machinery, logistics, and white collar work. There were other sectors that came about to support the shifting needs of society as it became something new.

The computer revolution then came and still required people to operate the computers, and very skilled individuals to make and maintain these early machines. The white collar and knowledge sector shifted focus and new ways of working came about with networking, mass storage devices, and other developments. Again, society shifted but there were still ways and places for individuals to make a living.

The "AI revolution" is something else entirely. It aims to subvert and replace the human at every level. AI agents are already being used to coordinate and spin up other agents for tasks, threatening to replace entire departments and fields (provided you don't care about being wrong or it working long term, which the C-suite often doesn't). These things can expand and replicate in a way never before experienced. There is some work for humans in cleaning up and fixing the mistakes of the agents,...