How Many Fundamental Constants Are There? (2011) John Baez

lioeters1 pts0 comments

constants

How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?

John Baez

April 22, 2011

You might at first think that the speed of light, Planck's constant<br>and Newton's gravitational constant are great examples of fundamental<br>physical constants.

But in fundamental physics, these constants<br>are so important that lots of people<br>use units where they all equal 1! The point<br>is that we can choose units of length, time and mass however we want.<br>That's three independent choices, so with a little luck we can use them to<br>get our favorite three constants to equal 1. Planck was the<br>first to notice this, so these units are called "Planck units".

Planck units are great for quantum gravity. They are not so<br>convenient for other purposes, however. The Planck length, for example,<br>is ridiculously small: about 2 &times; 10-35 meters. The Planck<br>time looks even worse: about 5 &times; 10-44 seconds. The Planck<br>mass is 2 &times; 10-8 kilograms. In ordinary life, and even in<br>nuclear physics, Planck units can be a real nuisance.

But in the grand scheme of things, units are not very important.<br>They are arbitrary human<br>conventions. As long as you stick with some choice or other<br>you will do okay.

Many constants involves units of length, time, mass, temperature,<br>charge and so on. The numerical value of these constants depend<br>on the units we use. The numbers would change if we used different<br>units. Thus, though they certainly tell us something about nature,<br>to some extent they are human artifacts.

On the other hand, certain constants don't depend on the units<br>we use - these are called "dimensionless" constants. Some of them<br>are numbers like pi, e, and the golden ratio - purely mathematical<br>constants, which anyone with a computer can calculate to as many<br>decimal places as they want. But others - at present - can only<br>be determined by experiment. These tell us facts about nature<br>that are completely independent of our choices of units.

The most famous example is the "fine structure constant", e2/ℏc. Here e is the electron charge, ℏ is Planck's constant, and c<br>is the speed of light. If you work out the units involved you'll see<br>it's dimensionless, and experiments show that it's about 1/137.03599.<br>Nobody knows why it equals this. At present, it's a completely<br>mysterious raw fact about the universe!

Constants that aren't<br>dimensionless can be regarded as relating one sort of unit to another.<br>For example, the speed of light has units of length over time, so it can<br>be used to turn units of time (like years) into units of length (like<br>light-years), or vice versa. People who are interested in fundamental<br>physical constants usually start by doing this as much as possible -<br>leaving the dimensionless constants, which are the really interesting<br>ones.

How many of these dimensionless fundamental constants are there?<br>This depends on your opinion on some new developments, but my best<br>guess is 26. All other dimensionless constants (aside from<br>those built into the initial conditions) can in principle be derived<br>from these, if our best theories of physics are correct - by which<br>I mean general relativity, which covers gravity, and the Standard Model,<br>which covers all the other forces. Of course, "in principle"<br>means "not necessarily by any simpler method than by simulating the<br>whole universe"!

General relativity and pure quantum mechanics have no dimensionless<br>constants, because the speed of light, the gravitational constant, and<br>Planck's constant merely suffice to set units of mass, length and time.<br>Thus, all the dimensionless constants come in from our wonderful,<br>baroque theory of all the forces other than gravity: the<br>Standard Model.

For starters, we have a bunch of masses. There are 6 kinds of quarks,<br>one positively charged and one negatively charged of each generation:<br>up, down; charmed, strange; top, and bottom. The masses of these<br>quarks, divided by the Planck mass, give 6 dimensionless constants. We<br>also have 3 kinds of massive leptons --- electron, muon, tau. The W and<br>Z bosons also have their masses. Then there is the Higgs, which while<br>still not detected, is very much part of the theory, so we get<br>another mass.

This gives us 6 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 12 dimensionless constants so far.

Then we have two coupling constants: the electromagnetic coupling<br>constant and the strong coupling constant. The electromagnetic<br>coupling constant is just another name for the fine structure constant;<br>it describes the strength of the electromagnetic field.<br>Similarly, the strong coupling<br>constant describes the strength of the strong force - the force transmitted<br>by gluons, which binds quarks together into baryons and mesons.

You may wonder why I'm not listing a coupling constant for the weak<br>force here. The reason is that you can calculate this from<br>the numbers I've already listed.

I should warn you here: there are different ways of slicing the<br>pie. Instead of the electromagnetic coupling constant<br>together with the masses of the W, Z, and Higgs, we could have used<br>4...

constants units constant planck dimensionless coupling

Related Articles