Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems

xmuruaga1 pts0 comments

[2608.15888] Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2608.15888 (cs)

[Submitted on 16 Aug 2026]

Title:Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems

Authors:Xabier Muruaga<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems, by Xabier Muruaga

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM-based agents can act on behalf of a user to access cloud services, call tools, or invoke agents. At session start, the agent's permissions are set but remain static, and each request is evaluated independently, without considering prior actions. Within its permissions, an agent may act contrary to the delegated task, combine individually permitted actions into a prohibited outcome, or delegate authority to a sub-agent without limiting it. A prompt injection poses a risk only if the agent has authority to perform such actions; this is therefore a problem of authorization architecture, not just the model. The Agentic Principal Chain (APC) tracks delegated authority from one principal to the next. APC evaluates each request against the accumulated session state using six authorization checks. APC carries forward and restricts delegated scope and budgets. Using composition closure, APC checks requests against prior actions to prevent prohibited combinations and enforces the decision outside the model. We prove Blast Radius Monotonicity and Composition Soundness for APC implementations; Composition Soundness is limited to prohibited combinations under a complete restriction set and serialized admission. We evaluated 3,154 instances including InjecAgent, AgentDojo, and ASB. Our compromised-model evaluation tests APC independently of model behavior by inserting the ground-truth attack call after the first legitimate tool call. AgentDojo exfiltration fell from 75-100% to 0% across all four domains; APC blocked all 544 InjecAgent data-stealing cases. Intent binding reduced destruction from 38.6% to 4.0% and manipulation from 90.5% to 12.1%. Authorization latency was 0.24 ms at the 99th percentile on an idle host; across 949 AgentDojo task-injection pairs, utility was 8.6 and 13.9 percentage points lower in the two settings. Implementation, evaluation tools, and data are publicly available.

Comments:<br>14 pages, 4 figures, 18 tables. Code and data: this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)

ACM classes:<br>D.4.6; K.6.5

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2608.15888 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2608.15888v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15888

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Xabier Muruaga [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 18:38:00 UTC (34 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems, by Xabier Muruaga<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.CR

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about...

toggle agent arxiv agents data security

Related Articles