Europe 2026 Greece 176 BC - Donato De Rosa
Donato De Rosa
SubscribeSign in
Europe 2026 Greece 176 BC<br>How Great Powers Turn Liberation into Hegemony
Donato De Rosa<br>Aug 19, 2026
Share
In 196 BC, during the Isthmian Games near Corinth, one of the great festivals at which the Greek world gathered, a Roman herald stepped forward before an enormous crowd and made an extraordinary announcement. The previous year Rome had defeated Philip V of Macedon at Cynoscephalae. Macedon, which for generations had been the dominant military power in Greece, had been humbled. Now the Roman commander Titus Quinctius Flamininus announced that the Greeks were free.<br>Plutarch preserves the words of the proclamation. The Greeks were to be free, ungarrisoned, exempt from tribute, and governed according to their ancestral laws.[1] He also tells us that the cheering was so deafening that birds flying over the stadium fell from the sky. Perhaps a literary embellishment, but the enthusiasm was real. Rome had not annexed Greece; its troops would soon withdraw. It had defeated the power that had dominated mainland Greece and proclaimed the restoration of Greek freedom.<br>Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Subscribe
Twenty years had passed. It was 176 BC. The Greek cities still had their assemblies, laws and magistrates; the Achaean League continued to meet; the once-powerful Aetolian League still existed, though greatly diminished; Athens remained a self-governing city of immense cultural prestige; Rhodes remained a sovereign republic; Macedon was still an independent kingdom. There was no Roman governor of Greece. Yet something fundamental had changed. Every Greek statesman of consequence now had to ask a question that would scarcely have occurred to his grandfather: how would Rome react? That question, more than any constitutional change, captures the transformation that had taken place since Flamininus proclaimed Greek freedom.<br>But our story is not only about Greece in 176 BC. It is also about Europe in 2026 and about the international order in which Europe now operates. Ancient Greece offers a particularly revealing comparison because it allows us to observe what happens when formally sovereign states live inside an order whose ultimate security and balance of power depend on somebody else. The parallel is not a claim that history repeats itself. The chronology is not exact, nor are the actors identical. It is a way of asking what the past can tell us about a present system that may itself be entering a period of profound change.<br>Hegemony rarely arrives all at once. It develops through a sequence of choices, precedents and accommodations. A great power that initially intervenes as a liberator becomes the arbiter to whom smaller states increasingly turn; military predominance creates political influence, political influence opens economic opportunities, and local elites learn to operate within the new distribution of power. Formal sovereignty may survive throughout much of this process. The story of Rome and the Greeks allows us to watch it unfold almost step by step. It also allows us to ask how far the comparison extends to Europe within the American order today.<br>But there is a further question. Rome in 176 BC was a rising power, while the United States in 2026 may be facing a very different trajectory. If the international order is now changing again, what happens to Europe when the hegemonic power on which its security has depended for eighty years is itself increasingly challenged?<br>Freedom in Healthy Moderation
The Second Macedonian War is where the story begins. At Cynoscephalae in 197 BC, the Roman legions defeated Philip V’s Macedonian army. Philip made peace, and the following year came the spectacular proclamation at Corinth. More important still, Rome subsequently withdrew its troops. That withdrawal matters because Rome could have occupied Greece but chose not to. Instead, it attempted to construct a Greek order capable largely of governing itself, but embedded within a strategic system made possible by Roman power.<br>The settlement was soon tested. The Aetolians, important allies of Rome against Philip but increasingly dissatisfied with the new order, turned to another great power. In 192 BC they invited Antiochus III into Greece. Antiochus ruled the immense Seleucid kingdom, the great eastern power of the age, stretching from Asia Minor and Syria through Mesopotamia and Iran toward Central Asia. He presented his intervention as a defense of Greek freedom against Rome.<br>The Greek response was divided. The Aetolians supported Antiochus, but the Achaean League sided with Rome, as did Philip V of Macedon. Rome defeated Antiochus at Thermopylae in 191 BC, forced him out of Greece and carried the war across the Aegean. At Magnesia the following year, a Roman army decisively defeated the Seleucid king in Asia Minor. The subsequent settlement forced Antiochus out of most of Asia...