100% of $250M Beats 10% of $2B - by Monica - on paper
on paper
SubscribeSign in
100% of $250M Beats 10% of $2B<br>The dilution math founders skip when they're chasing venture scale.
Monica<br>Aug 21, 2026
Share
Bootstrapping, seedstrapping, venture-backed…it’s all about what kind of company you’re aiming to become , not how much money you could use.<br>I’m talking to more companies building niche tools like family assistants or vertical AI for long-tail industries. The beauty of the build getting cheaper is that ideas that weren’t fundable before are fundable now. The question is to what extent?<br>“Venture scale” moved up while cost structure moved down. Decacorns aren’t rare anymore, and they’re the ones taking up all the mindshare. That’s where growth expectations and valuation multiples are set, everything flows downstream from there. VCs are raising larger and larger funds, so to “return the fund” and then some, they often need to be underwriting $5–10B+ potential outcomes now, not $1B.<br>So do the math before you chase that next round. After all, owning 100% of a $250M business beats owning 10% of a $2B one. And every round costs you 20–30% of the company, between investor dilution and the employee pool refresh.<br>If you don’t see a real path to $5–10B, or well over $100M in revenue, the leaner path (bootstrapping or “seedstrapping”) isn’t a consolation prize. It’s the better trade.
Subscribe
Hi! I'm Monica, a former venture investor turned operator. Currently advising, investing, and writing On Paper about what building companies looks like from both sides of the table.
Share
Discussion about this post<br>CommentsRestacks
TopLatestDiscussions
No posts
Ready for more?
Subscribe
© 2026 Monica · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice<br>Start your SubstackGet the app<br>Substack is the home for great culture
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please turn on JavaScript or unblock scripts