[2608.18300] The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations

Skip to main content

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2608.18300 (cs)

[Submitted on 18 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 20 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations

Authors:Emma Yanyang Kong, JJ Tan, Ishan Gupta, Lars Olds, Claire Campbell, David Fagnan, Ratna Kavuri, Veli Balin, Rohan Gosain, Louis Garcia, Minsu Jang<br>View a PDF of the paper titled The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations, by Emma Yanyang Kong and 10 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM-as-a-Judge, which leverages a large language model to evaluate natural language generated by another AI application or model, has become a standard, scalable approach for accelerating and extending costly human evaluation. However, most work treats a judge as a static artifact, evaluating it once at construction or against a fixed benchmark. In contrast, we argue that an LLM judge running in a production system is better understood as having a lifecycle: it must be built, trained, deployed, and continuously maintained as the surrounding data evolves, and each phase poses distinct technical and operational challenges.

We present such a lifecycle for the LLM judges that evaluate user-facing recommendation explanations at Netflix, where our pipeline generates and the judges assess hundreds of thousands of distinct show-level explanations per week, served across the mobile experience to millions of members. Our framework has four phases: (I) Birth, defining multiple evaluation criteria and building curated benchmark datasets with human labels and rationales; (II) Training, refining the judges' rubrics via Reasoning-Aligned Rubric Tuning (RART), a rubric-tuning procedure that uses a meta-judge over reasoning output as the learning signal; (III) Deployment, in which one judge serves two production roles: quality gating and reflective generation; and (IV) Monitoring, a continuous Human-in-the-Loop alignment process that detects drift and triggers re-tuning behind a human review gate. We report post-launch results from a five-week A/B test over tens of millions of members, in which the judge-aligned explanations shifted member viewing toward novel content (previously unwatched) and increased successful browse-to-play sessions relative to a no-explanation control, with no quality-related takedowns.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2608.18300 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2608.18300v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18300

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Emma Yanyang Kong [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:27:09 UTC (495 KB)

[v2]<br>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 23:11:50 UTC (495 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations, by Emma Yanyang Kong and 10 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea...